Controlled versus Automatic Processes: Which Is Dominant to Safety? The Moderating Effect of Inhibitory Control

	Controlled versus Automatic Processes: Which Is Dominant to Safety? The Moderating Effect of Inhibitory Control
	Xu, Yaoshan1,2 ; Li, Yongjuan1 ; Ding, Weidong 3; Lu, Fan 3
摘要	This study explores the precursors of employees' safety behaviors based on a dual-process model, which suggests that human behaviors are determined by both controlled and automatic cognitive processes. Employees' responses to a self-reported survey on safety attitudes capture their controlled cognitive process, while the automatic association concerning safety measured by an Implicit Association Test (IAT) reflects employees' automatic cognitive processes about safety. In addition, this study investigates the moderating effects of inhibition on the relationship between self-reported safety attitude and safety behavior, and that between automatic associations towards safety and safety behavior. The results suggest significant main effects of self-reported safety attitude and automatic association on safety behaviors. Further, the interaction between self-reported safety attitude and inhibition and that between automatic association and inhibition each predict unique variances in safety behavior. Specifically, the safety behaviors of employees with lower level of inhibitory control are influenced more by automatic association, whereas those of employees with higher level of inhibitory control are guided more by self-reported safety attitudes. These results suggest that safety behavior is the joint outcome of both controlled and automatic cognitive processes, and the relative importance of these cognitive processes depends on employees' individual differences in inhibitory control. The implications of these findings for theoretical and practical issues are discussed at the end.
	2014-02-10
语种	英语
发表期刊	PLOS ONE
ISSN	1932-6203
卷号	9 期号:2 页码:e87881
期刊论文类型	Article
收录类别	SCI
WOS记录号	WOS:000331254600029
引用统计	被引频次：13[WOS] [WOS记录] [WOS相关记录]
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/14255
专题	中国科学院行为科学重点实验室
作者单位	1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China 3.Res Inst Nucl Power Operat China, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
第一作者单位	中国科学院行为科学重点实验室
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Xu, Yaoshan,Li, Yongjuan,Ding, Weidong,et al. Controlled versus Automatic Processes: Which Is Dominant to Safety? The Moderating Effect of Inhibitory Control[J]. PLOS ONE,2014,9(2):e87881.
APA	Xu, Yaoshan,Li, Yongjuan,Ding, Weidong,&Lu, Fan.(2014).Controlled versus Automatic Processes: Which Is Dominant to Safety? The Moderating Effect of Inhibitory Control.PLOS ONE,9(2),e87881.
MLA	Xu, Yaoshan,et al."Controlled versus Automatic Processes: Which Is Dominant to Safety? The Moderating Effect of Inhibitory Control".PLOS ONE 9.2(2014):e87881.

条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小	文献类型	版本类型	开放类型	使用许可
WOS_000331254600029.（300KB）	期刊论文	出版稿	暂不开放	CC BY-NC-SA	请求全文