PSYCH OpenIR  > 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室
Steinberg父母教养方式问卷中文修订及信、效度评价
Alternative TitleEvaluation on reliability and validity of Steinberg Parenting Scale,Chinese revision
龙瑞华1; 黄端1; 张建新1
2012
Source Publication中国公共卫生
Correspondent Emailzhangjx@psych.ac.cn
ISSN1001-0580
Subtype期刊论文
Volume28Issue:4Pages:439-441
Contribution Rank1
Abstract目的对Steinberg父母教养方式问卷进行中文版修订和信度及效度检验,为该量表在中国的推广使用提供科学依据。方法使用翻译成中文的Steinberg父母教养方式问卷对河北省保定市的356名中小学生进行初测,并根据项目分析和探索性因素分析的结果甄选项目;修订量表后对7省18个城镇的7 460名中小学生正式施测,评价该量表的信度和效度。结果通过探索性因素分析,确定中文修订的Steinberg父母教养方式问卷由参与、心理自主、严格/监督3个因子共21个条目组成,累积方差解释率为37.9%;验证性因素分析结果表明,3个因子结构对数据的拟合较好(RMSEA=0.051,CFI=0.923,NNFI=0.913);参与、心理自主和严格/监督3个分量表的内部一致性系数分别0.71、0.69和0.71,分半信度系数分别为0.70、0.66和0.65;各因子与总量表的相关系数分别为0.76、0.59和0.54,均>0.50,且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),表明量表具有较好的信度和效度。结论修订后的中文版Stein-berg父母教养方式问卷具有较好的信度和效度,可应用于中国父母教养方式的研究与实践。
Other AbstractObjective To provide scientific evidence for the general use of the Steinberg Parenting Scale in China and to revise Steinberg Parenting Scale in Chinese and to assess its reliability and validity.Methods Firstly,each item of the scale was translated into Chinese and administered to 356 primary and secondary school students in Baoding city,and then the items of the scale were selected based on the results of item analysis and exploratory factor analysis(EFA).Secondly,formal test was conducted among 7 460 primary and middle school students from 18 cities and towns in 7 provinces to test the validity and reliability of the scale.Results A three-factor model(involvement,psychological autonomy-granting,and strictness/supervision)including 21 items was found in EFA with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 37.9%.The fit indexes in confirmatory factor analyses were as following:root mean square error of approximation(RMSEA)=0.051,comparative fit index(CFI)=0.923,nonnormed fit index(NNFI)=0.913.The Cronbach′s α was 0.71 for involvement,0.69 for psychological autonomy granting,and 0.71 for strictness/supervision,respectively.The split-half index was 0.70 for involvement,0.66 for psychological autonomy granting,and 0.75 for strictness/supervision,respectively.The correlation coefficient between each subscale and total scale was 0.76 for involvement,0.59 for psychological autonomy granting,and 0.54 for strictness/supervision,respectively.Conclusion The results suggest that the Chinese version of Steinberg Parenting Scale has acceptable validity and reliability and can be applied in the study in China.
KeywordSteinberg父母教养方式问卷 修订 中文版 信度 效度
Subject Area教育心理学
URL查看原文
Indexed ByCSCD
Language中文
Funding Organization科技部863计划(2006AA02Z426)
CSCD IDCSCD:4513187
Citation statistics
Document Type期刊论文
Identifierhttp://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/14380
Collection中国科学院心理健康重点实验室
Corresponding Author张建新
Affiliation1.中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室
2.中国科学院研究生院
First Author AffilicationInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Corresponding Author AffilicationInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
龙瑞华,黄端,张建新. Steinberg父母教养方式问卷中文修订及信、效度评价[J]. 中国公共卫生,2012,28(4):439-441.
APA 龙瑞华,黄端,&张建新.(2012).Steinberg父母教养方式问卷中文修订及信、效度评价.中国公共卫生,28(4),439-441.
MLA 龙瑞华,et al."Steinberg父母教养方式问卷中文修订及信、效度评价".中国公共卫生 28.4(2012):439-441.
Files in This Item:
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
Steinberg父母教养方式问卷中文修(181KB)期刊论文作者接受稿限制开放CC BY-NC-SAView Application Full Text
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[龙瑞华]'s Articles
[黄端]'s Articles
[张建新]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[龙瑞华]'s Articles
[黄端]'s Articles
[张建新]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[龙瑞华]'s Articles
[黄端]'s Articles
[张建新]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
File name: Steinberg父母教养方式问卷中文修订及信_效度评价_龙瑞华.pdf
Format: Adobe PDF
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.