PSYCH OpenIR  > 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室
How to Set Focal Categories for Brief Implicit Association Test? "Good" Is Good, "Bad" Is Not So Good
Shi, Yuanyuan1,2; Cai, Huajian1; Shen, Yiqin Alicia3; Yang, Jing4
2016-02-03
发表期刊FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN1664-1078
文章类型Article
卷号7期号:0页码:1-10
摘要Three studies were conducted to examine the validity of the four versions of BIATs that are supposed to measure the same construct but differ in shared focal category. Study 1 investigated the criterion validity of four BIATs measuring attitudes toward flower versus insect. Study 2 examined the experimental sensitivity of four BIATs by considering attitudes toward induced ingroup versus outgroup. Study 3 examined the predictive power of the four BIATs by investigating attitudes toward the commercial beverages Coke versus Sprite. The findings suggested that for the two attributes "good" and "bad," "good" rather than "bad" proved to be good as a shared focal category; for two targets, so long as they clearly differed in goodness or valence, the "good" rather than "bad" target emerged as good for a shared focal category. Beyond this case, either target worked well. These findings may facilitate the understanding of the BIAT and its future applications.
关键词Brief Implicit Association Test (Biat) Implicit AssocIation Test (Iat) Focal Category Validity Implicit Measurement
DOI10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00038
收录类别SSCI
语种英语
项目资助者Major Project of the National Social Science Foundation of China(13ZD073) ; National Science Foundation of China(31571148)
WOS研究方向Psychology
WOS类目Psychology, Multidisciplinary
WOS记录号WOS:000369130500001
WOS标题词Social Sciences
关键词[WOS]COGNITION
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/19564
专题中国科学院行为科学重点实验室
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
3.Univ Washington, Dept Psychol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
4.Huaqiao Univ, Coll Tourism, Quanzhou, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Shi, Yuanyuan,Cai, Huajian,Shen, Yiqin Alicia,et al. How to Set Focal Categories for Brief Implicit Association Test? "Good" Is Good, "Bad" Is Not So Good[J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY,2016,7(0):1-10.
APA Shi, Yuanyuan,Cai, Huajian,Shen, Yiqin Alicia,&Yang, Jing.(2016).How to Set Focal Categories for Brief Implicit Association Test? "Good" Is Good, "Bad" Is Not So Good.FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY,7(0),1-10.
MLA Shi, Yuanyuan,et al."How to Set Focal Categories for Brief Implicit Association Test? "Good" Is Good, "Bad" Is Not So Good".FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY 7.0(2016):1-10.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Shi_Cai_2016_How to (640KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取CC BY-NC-SA请求全文
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Shi, Yuanyuan]的文章
[Cai, Huajian]的文章
[Shen, Yiqin Alicia]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Shi, Yuanyuan]的文章
[Cai, Huajian]的文章
[Shen, Yiqin Alicia]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Shi, Yuanyuan]的文章
[Cai, Huajian]的文章
[Shen, Yiqin Alicia]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。