人一致地估计纹理相似度吗?
Alternative Title#br# Do Humans Estimate Texture Similarity in a Consistent Way?
Xinghui Dong; Mike J. Chantler; Junyu Dong
2016
Conference Name2016年第一届北京视觉科学会议
Conference Date2016-07
Conference Place北京
Funding Organization中国科学院心理研究所
Other AbstractPURPOSE: In a pair-of-pairs comparison experiment, Clarke et al. [2012] showed human observers two pairs of textures and required them to decide on which pair was more similar. Dong and Chantler [2013] further examined 51 sets of computational image features for estimating the humans’ perceptual judgements but they found that none performed well. A question hence arises: do humans estimate texture similarity in a consistent way? In this study, we conduct an experiment in order to answer it.
METHODS: The top 80 most inconsistent pairs of pairs of textures between humans’ judgements and the results obtained using features were selected. Only the pair that the majority of the 51 feature sets chose as dissimilar but the observers [Clarke et al., 2012] disagreed with this in each pair of pairs was used. An experiment was conducted using eight native English speakers. Given a pair of textures, the observer was required to describe the similarity of these using at least one of the 98 English words that Bhushan et al. [1997] used.
RESULTS: The occurrence frequencies of the 98 words were accumulated into a histogram. Since these words were divided into eleven clusters by Bhushan et al. [1997], the frequencies of the words in the same cluster were collapsed into a single bin. Considering the size of each cluster was di?erent, the collapsed frequency of each cluster was then normalized using its size. It was found that four clusters of words were more frequently used than the others, including “regular”, “lined”, “netlike” and “bumpy” (only one word was listed for each cluster).
CONCLUSIONS: Experimental results show that regularity, directionality and bumpiness mainly account for the perceptual judgements that human observers chose the 80 pairs in the pair-of-pairs comparison experiment [Clarke et al., 2012]. This finding suggests that humans estimate texture similarity in a consistent manner.
KeywordTexture similarity texture properties human perception
Subject Area感知觉心理学
URL查看原文
Indexed By其他
Language英语
Document Type会议论文
Identifierhttp://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/20885
Collection心理所主办、承办、协办学术会议_2016年第一届北京视觉科学会议_会议摘要
Affiliation1.Centre for Imaging Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
2.Texture Lab, School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
3.Department of Computer Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266071, China
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Xinghui Dong,Mike J. Chantler,Junyu Dong. 人一致地估计纹理相似度吗?[C]. 见:2016年第一届北京视觉科学会议. 北京. 2016-07.http://vision.csp.escience.cn/dct/page/1.
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Xinghui Dong]'s Articles
[Mike J. Chantler]'s Articles
[Junyu Dong]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[Xinghui Dong]'s Articles
[Mike J. Chantler]'s Articles
[Junyu Dong]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[Xinghui Dong]'s Articles
[Mike J. Chantler]'s Articles
[Junyu Dong]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.