PSYCH OpenIR  > 健康与遗传心理学研究室
Individual and culture-level components of survey response styles: A multi-level analysis using cultural models of selfhood
Smith, Peter B.1; Vignoles, Vivian L.1; Becker, Maja2; Owe, Ellinor1; Easterbrook, Matthew J.1; Brown, Rupert1; Bourguignon, David3; Gardarsdottir, Ragna B.4; Kreuzbauer, Robert5,6; Cendales Ayala, Boris7; Yuki, Masaki8; Zhang, Jianxin9; Lv, Shaobo10; Chobthamkit, Phatthanakit11; Jaafar, Jas Laile12; Fischer, Ronald13; Milfont, Taciano L.13; Gavreliuc, Alin14; Baguma, Peter15; Bond, Michael Harris16; Martin, Mariana17; Gausel, Nicolay18; Schwartz, Seth J.19; Des Rosiers, Sabrina E.20; Tatarko, Alexander21; Gonzalez, Roberto22; Didier, Nicolas22; Carrasco, Diego22; Lay, Siugmin22; Nizharadze, George23; Torres, Ana24; Camino, Leoncio24; Abuhamdeh, Sami25; Macapagal, Ma Elizabeth J.26; Koller, Silvia H.27; Herman, Ginette28; Courtois, Marie28; Fritsche, Immo29; Espinosa, Agustin30; Villamar, Juan A.31; Regalia, Camillo32; Manzi, Claudia32; Brambilla, Maria32; Zinkeng, Martina33; Jalal, Baland34; Kusdil, Ersin35; Amponsah, Benjamin36; Caglar, Selinay37; Mekonnen, Kassahun Habtamu38; Moeller, Bettina39; Zhang, Xiao40; Schweiger Gallo, Inge41; Prieto Gil, Paula41; Lorente Clemares, Raquel41; Campara, Gabriella41; Aldhafri, Said42; Fulop, Marta; Pyszczynski, Tom43,46; Kesebir, Pelin44; Harb, Charles45
摘要

Variations in acquiescence and extremity pose substantial threats to the validity of cross-cultural research that relies on survey methods. Individual and cultural correlates of response styles when using 2 contrasting types of response mode were investigated, drawing on data from 55 cultural groups across 33 nations. Using 7 dimensions of self-other relatedness that have often been confounded within the broader distinction between independence and interdependence, our analysis yields more specific understandings of both individual- and culture-level variations in response style. When using a Likert-scale response format, acquiescence is strongest among individuals seeing themselves as similar to others, and where cultural models of selfhood favour harmony, similarity with others and receptiveness to influence. However, when using Schwartz's (2007) portrait-comparison response procedure, acquiescence is strongest among individuals seeing themselves as self-reliant but also connected to others, and where cultural models of selfhood favour self-reliance and self-consistency. Extreme responding varies less between the two types of response modes, and is most prevalent among individuals seeing themselves as self-reliant, and in cultures favouring self-reliance. As both types of response mode elicit distinctive styles of response, it remains important to estimate and control for style effects to ensure valid comparisons.

关键词Response style Culture Self-construal
2016-12-01
语种英语
DOI10.1002/ijop.12293
发表期刊INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN0020-7594
卷号51期号:6页码:453-463
期刊论文类型Article
收录类别SSCI
WOS关键词COMMUNICATION STYLES ; IMPLICIT THEORIES ; COLLECTIVISM ; CONSTRUALS ; DIMENSIONS ; COUNTRIES ; VALUES
WOS标题词Social Sciences
WOS研究方向Psychology
WOS类目Psychology, Multidisciplinary
WOS记录号WOS:000389217900007
资助机构Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC, UK)(RES-062-23-1300) ; ESRC(ES/G015074/1) ; Interdisciplinary Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Studies(FONDAP 15110006) ; Center for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies(FONDAP 15130009) ; Anillos CONICYT(SOC1103)
引用统计
被引频次:40[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/20937
专题健康与遗传心理学研究室
作者单位1.Univ Sussex, Sch Psychol, Brighton BN1 9QH, E Sussex, England
2.Univ Toulouse, CLLE, Toulouse, France
3.Paul Verlaine Univ, Equipe PErSEUs EA 7312, Metz, France
4.Univ Iceland, Dept Psychol, Reykjavik, Iceland
5.Nanyang Technol Univ, Nanyang Business Sch, Dept Mkt & Int Business, Singapore, Singapore
6.Nanyang Technol Univ, Nanyang Business Sch, Inst Asian Consumer Insight, Singapore, Singapore
7.Univ Los Andes, Dept Psychol, Bogota, Colombia
8.Hokkaido Univ, Behav Sci Ctr Expt Res Social Sci, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
9.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
10.North China Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Psychol, Tangshan, Peoples R China
11.Thammasat Univ, Dept Psychol Lib Sci & Geog, Div Psychol, Bangkok, Thailand
12.Univ Malaya, Dept Educ Psychol & Counseling, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
13.Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Psychol, Ctr Appl Cross Cultural Res, Wellington, New Zealand
14.West Univ Timisoara, Dept Psychol, Timisoara, Romania
15.Makerere Univ, Sch Psychol, Dept Educ Social & Org Psychol, Kampala, Uganda
16.Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Fac Business, Management & Mkt, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
17.Univ Namibia, Dept Human Sci, Windhoek, Namibia
18.Univ Agder, Dept Psychosocial Hlth, Kristiansand, Norway
19.Univ Miami, Leonard M Miller Sch Med, Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Miami, FL USA
20.Barry Univ, Dept Psychol, Miami, FL USA
21.Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Dept Psychol, Moscow, Russia
22.Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Sch Psychol, Santiago, Chile
23.Free Univ Tbilisi, Dept Social Sci, Tbilisi, Rep of Georgia
24.Univ Fed Paraiba, Dept Psychol, Joao Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil
25.Istanbul Sehir Univ, Dept Psychol, Istanbul, Turkey
26.Ateneo Manila Univ, Dept Psychol, Manila, Philippines
27.Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Psychol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
28.Catholic Univ Louvain, Psychol Sci Res Inst, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
29.Univ Leipzig, Inst Psychol, Leipzig, Germany
30.Pontificia Univ Catolica Peru, Dept Psychol, Lima, Peru
31.Northwestern Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
32.Catholic Univ Milan, Dept Psychol, Milan, Italy
33.Univ Buea, Dept Guidance & Counseling, Buea, Cameroon
34.Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, England
35.Uludag Univ, Dept Psychol, Bursa, Turkey
36.Univ Ghana, Accra, Ghana
37.Ankara Univ, Ankara, Turkey
38.Univ Addis Ababa, Sch Psychol, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
39.Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena, Inst Psychol, Jena, Germany
40.Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Human Sci, Osaka, Japan
41.Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Psicol Social, Madrid, Spain
42.Sultan Qaboos Univ, Dept Psychol, Muscat, Oman
43.Hungarian Acad Sci, Inst Cognit Neurosci & Psychol, Budapest, Hungary
44.Univ Wisconsin Madison, Ctr Hlth Minds, Madison, WI USA
45.Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Psychol, Beirut, Lebanon
46.Univ Colorado, Dept Psychol, Colorado Springs, CO USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Smith, Peter B.,Vignoles, Vivian L.,Becker, Maja,et al. Individual and culture-level components of survey response styles: A multi-level analysis using cultural models of selfhood[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY,2016,51(6):453-463.
APA Smith, Peter B..,Vignoles, Vivian L..,Becker, Maja.,Owe, Ellinor.,Easterbrook, Matthew J..,...&Harb, Charles.(2016).Individual and culture-level components of survey response styles: A multi-level analysis using cultural models of selfhood.INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY,51(6),453-463.
MLA Smith, Peter B.,et al."Individual and culture-level components of survey response styles: A multi-level analysis using cultural models of selfhood".INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 51.6(2016):453-463.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Individual and cultu(139KB)期刊论文出版稿限制开放CC BY-NC-SA请求全文
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Smith, Peter B.]的文章
[Vignoles, Vivian L.]的文章
[Becker, Maja]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Smith, Peter B.]的文章
[Vignoles, Vivian L.]的文章
[Becker, Maja]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Smith, Peter B.]的文章
[Vignoles, Vivian L.]的文章
[Becker, Maja]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。