PSYCH OpenIR  > 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室
中文版员工真实性量表的信效度检验
Alternative TitleReliability and Validity of the Individual Authenticity Measure at Work for Chinese Employees
刘兴云1,2; 王詠1
First Author刘兴云
2016
Source Publication中国临床心理学杂志
Correspondent Emailwangy@psych.ac.cn
ISSN1005-3611
Subtype期刊论文
Volume24Issue:3Pages:454-458
Contribution Rank1
Abstract

目的:检验员工真实性量表(Individual authenticity measure at work,IAM Work)在中国企业员工中应用的信度和效度。方法:用IAM Work中文版对657名企业员工进行测试,在样本中随机抽取214名员工同时施测IAM Work中文版、Utrecht工作投入量表简版(UWES-9)、建言行为量表和中国企业员工工作幸福感量表,并在两个月后重测。结果:验证性因素分析验证了员工真实性的三因素模型。各拟合指标分别为χ2/df=2.61,NFI=0.94,CFI=0.96,IFI=0.96,GFI=0.93,AGFI=0.91,RMSEA=0.05。简版量表为χ2/df=2.99,NFI=0.97,CFI=0.98,IFI=0.98,GFI=0.96,AGFI=0.94,RMSEA=0.06。所有项目的决断值均显著(P〈0.001),项目与量表总分的相关在0.46~0.77之间。IAM Work中文版量表和真实的生活、自我异化、接受外部影响的Cronbach’sα系数依次为0.92、0.90、0.93、0.91。简版量表的Cronbach’sα系数依次为0.89、0.83、0.92、0.92。IAM Work量表两个月后的重测信度为0.79,简版为0.78。IAM Work中文版总分、简版总分与工作幸福感(r=0.67,0.58,P〈0.01)、工作投入(r=0.50,0.43,P〈0.01)与建言行为(r=0.34,0.23,P〈0.01)呈现显著正相关。结论:IAM Work中文版量表和简版量表具有良好的信效度,适合在中国背景下使用。

;

Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Individual Authenticity Measure at Work(IAM Work). Methods: The reliability and validity of the IAM Work was tested using a sample size of 657 employees. To evaluate the validity of the IAM Work, 214 employees were randomly selected to test with the IAM Work, UWES-9, Voice Behavior Scale, and the Employee Occupational Well-being in Chinese Enterprises Scale. These employees were re- tested two months later. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the three-factor structure model. The fitted indi- ces are x2/df=2.61, NFI=0.94, CFI=0.96, IFI=0.96, GFI=0.93, AGFI=0.91, RMSEA=0.05, and the fitted indices for the short version are x2/df=2.99, NFI=0.97, CFI=0.98, IFI=0.98, GFI=0.96, AGFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.06. The critical ratios of all the items were statistically significant(P〈0.001), and the correlations between each item and the total score ranged from 0.46 to 0.77. The Cronbach' s ct coefficients of the total scale, authentic living, self-alienation, and accepting external influ- ence subscale were 0.92, 0.90, 0.93 and 0.91 respectively. The Cronbach' sot coefficients for the short version are 0.89, 0.83, 0.92 and 0.92 respectively. The test-retest reliability after 2 months is 0.79 for the full scale and 0.7g for the short ver- sion. The total scores of both the Chinese version of IAM Work and the short version showed significant positive correlations with occupational well-being(r=0.67, 0.58, P〈0.01), work engagement(r=0.50, 0.43, P〈0.01), and the Voice Behavior Scale total score(r=0.34, 0.23, P〈0.01). Conclusion: Both Chinese version of IAM Work and the short version are reliable, valid, and suitable for measuring the authenticity of Chinese employees.

Keyword员工真实性 员工真实性量表(IAM Work) 信度 效度
Subject Area工业与组织心理学
DOI10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2016.03.016
URL查看原文
Indexed ByCSCD
Language中文
Funding Organization中科院心理所创新项目“国民幸福感指数的建构与影响因素识别”(Y1CX193007)
CSCD IDCSCD:5723535
Citation statistics
Document Type期刊论文
Identifierhttp://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/21173
Collection中国科学院行为科学重点实验室
Corresponding Author王詠
Affiliation1.中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室
2.中国科学院大学
First Author AffilicationInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Corresponding Author AffilicationInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
刘兴云,王詠. 中文版员工真实性量表的信效度检验[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2016,24(3):454-458.
APA 刘兴云,&王詠.(2016).中文版员工真实性量表的信效度检验.中国临床心理学杂志,24(3),454-458.
MLA 刘兴云,et al."中文版员工真实性量表的信效度检验".中国临床心理学杂志 24.3(2016):454-458.
Files in This Item:
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
中文版员工真实性量表的信效度检验_刘兴云(1033KB)期刊论文出版稿限制开放CC BY-NC-SAView Application Full Text
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[刘兴云]'s Articles
[王詠]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[刘兴云]'s Articles
[王詠]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[刘兴云]'s Articles
[王詠]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
File name: 中文版员工真实性量表的信效度检验_刘兴云.pdf
Format: Adobe PDF
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.