PSYCH OpenIR  > 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室
Alternative TitleReliability and Validity of the Individual Authenticity Measure at Work for Chinese Employees
刘兴云1,2; 王詠1
First Author刘兴云
Source Publication中国临床心理学杂志
Contribution Rank1

目的:检验员工真实性量表(Individual authenticity measure at work,IAM Work)在中国企业员工中应用的信度和效度。方法:用IAM Work中文版对657名企业员工进行测试,在样本中随机抽取214名员工同时施测IAM Work中文版、Utrecht工作投入量表简版(UWES-9)、建言行为量表和中国企业员工工作幸福感量表,并在两个月后重测。结果:验证性因素分析验证了员工真实性的三因素模型。各拟合指标分别为χ2/df=2.61,NFI=0.94,CFI=0.96,IFI=0.96,GFI=0.93,AGFI=0.91,RMSEA=0.05。简版量表为χ2/df=2.99,NFI=0.97,CFI=0.98,IFI=0.98,GFI=0.96,AGFI=0.94,RMSEA=0.06。所有项目的决断值均显著(P〈0.001),项目与量表总分的相关在0.46~0.77之间。IAM Work中文版量表和真实的生活、自我异化、接受外部影响的Cronbach’sα系数依次为0.92、0.90、0.93、0.91。简版量表的Cronbach’sα系数依次为0.89、0.83、0.92、0.92。IAM Work量表两个月后的重测信度为0.79,简版为0.78。IAM Work中文版总分、简版总分与工作幸福感(r=0.67,0.58,P〈0.01)、工作投入(r=0.50,0.43,P〈0.01)与建言行为(r=0.34,0.23,P〈0.01)呈现显著正相关。结论:IAM Work中文版量表和简版量表具有良好的信效度,适合在中国背景下使用。


Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Individual Authenticity Measure at Work(IAM Work). Methods: The reliability and validity of the IAM Work was tested using a sample size of 657 employees. To evaluate the validity of the IAM Work, 214 employees were randomly selected to test with the IAM Work, UWES-9, Voice Behavior Scale, and the Employee Occupational Well-being in Chinese Enterprises Scale. These employees were re- tested two months later. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the three-factor structure model. The fitted indi- ces are x2/df=2.61, NFI=0.94, CFI=0.96, IFI=0.96, GFI=0.93, AGFI=0.91, RMSEA=0.05, and the fitted indices for the short version are x2/df=2.99, NFI=0.97, CFI=0.98, IFI=0.98, GFI=0.96, AGFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.06. The critical ratios of all the items were statistically significant(P〈0.001), and the correlations between each item and the total score ranged from 0.46 to 0.77. The Cronbach' s ct coefficients of the total scale, authentic living, self-alienation, and accepting external influ- ence subscale were 0.92, 0.90, 0.93 and 0.91 respectively. The Cronbach' sot coefficients for the short version are 0.89, 0.83, 0.92 and 0.92 respectively. The test-retest reliability after 2 months is 0.79 for the full scale and 0.7g for the short ver- sion. The total scores of both the Chinese version of IAM Work and the short version showed significant positive correlations with occupational well-being(r=0.67, 0.58, P〈0.01), work engagement(r=0.50, 0.43, P〈0.01), and the Voice Behavior Scale total score(r=0.34, 0.23, P〈0.01). Conclusion: Both Chinese version of IAM Work and the short version are reliable, valid, and suitable for measuring the authenticity of Chinese employees.

Keyword员工真实性 员工真实性量表(IAM Work) 信度 效度
Subject Area工业与组织心理学
Indexed ByCSCD
Funding Organization中科院心理所创新项目“国民幸福感指数的建构与影响因素识别”(Y1CX193007)
Citation statistics
Document Type期刊论文
Corresponding Author王詠
First Author AffilicationInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Corresponding Author AffilicationInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
刘兴云,王詠. 中文版员工真实性量表的信效度检验[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2016,24(3):454-458.
APA 刘兴云,&王詠.(2016).中文版员工真实性量表的信效度检验.中国临床心理学杂志,24(3),454-458.
MLA 刘兴云,et al."中文版员工真实性量表的信效度检验".中国临床心理学杂志 24.3(2016):454-458.
Files in This Item:
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
中文版员工真实性量表的信效度检验_刘兴云(1033KB)期刊论文出版稿限制开放CC BY-NC-SAView Application Full Text
Related Services
Recommend this item
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[刘兴云]'s Articles
[王詠]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[刘兴云]'s Articles
[王詠]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[刘兴云]'s Articles
[王詠]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
File name: 中文版员工真实性量表的信效度检验_刘兴云.pdf
Format: Adobe PDF
All comments (0)
No comment.

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.