PSYCH OpenIR  > 认知与发展心理学研究室
Alternative TitleThe cognitive processing of contrastive focus and its relationship with pitch accent
李卫君1; 张晶晶2,3; 杨玉芳2,3
Correspondent ;

信息结构作为语言学的一个重要概念, 在语言学、心理学和神经科学等领域进行了广泛的研究。其中, 从焦点和背景这一维度对信息结构的研究最多。通常情况下, 人们会重读焦点信息。本研究使用ERP 技术, 通过对话语篇考察了不同位置对比焦点和重读的一致性对口语语篇理解的影响。研究发现, 对比焦点不受位置影响, 稳定诱发中后部分布正波, 且小句末尾焦点诱发的正效应早于小句内部。此外, 重读相对于不重读在小句内部和末尾都诱发了正效应, 并且出现在较晚的时间窗口。尽管焦点不重读相对于一致性重读没有诱发任何脑电效应, 但背景重读相对背景不重读在小句末尾诱发了一个早期负效应。本研究表明, 听者按照不同的方式、即时使用不同位置的对比焦点和重读信息建构语篇表征。

Other Abstract

Information structure (IS) is a very important pragmatic concept in linguistics. It has been broadly studied in linguistics, psychology, neuroscience, etc. IS can be generally distinguished as focus/new information and background/given information. It is proper for focused/new information to receive accent. Recently, researchers have shown increasing interest in the neural mechanism of focus processing and its relationship with pitch accent. It was generally found that focus elicited a widely distributed positivity compared to background (non-focused) information in both visual and auditory domain, although these positivities varied in time course, amplitude and scalp distribution. As for its relationship with pitch accent, the results are complicated due to the variability in task (prosodic, semantic), language (German, Dutch, and Chinese, etc.), focus-marking device (context-question, pitch accent, it cleft structure, etc.), as well as information status (being new or given information).
The present study aims to investigate the processing of contrastive focus and its interaction with pitch accent at different positions using ERPs. We used a highly constraining question as context, which posited two single nouns (NP1 and NP2) at different positions (in the medial and end of clause) in the answer sentence as contrastive focus (new information, narrow focus). Twenty (nine males) healthy undergraduates participated in the experiment. The participants were told to listen carefully to each dialogue, and completed a sentence comprehension task. The EEG was recorded from 64 scalp channels using electrodes mounted in an elastic cap. Focus and accent related ERPs were calculated for a 1500 ms epoch including a 200 ms pre-critical words baseline. It was found that focus evoked a larger positivity compared to non-focus at both positions. This was convinced by the statistical analysis result at both NP1 during 650-1300 ms, F(1, 19) = 8.29, p < 0.05, η2 p = 0.29, and NP2 during 550-1050 ms, F(1, 19) = 14.45, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.38. Besides, accented words elicited a larger positivity than unaccented ones at both of NP1 (950-1150 ms), F(1, 19) = 7.39, p < 0.05, η2p = 0.22, and
NP2(1050-1400ms), F(1, 19) = 8.04, p < 0.05, η2p = 0.30. Furthermore, missing accent on focus did not elicit any observable brain effect compared to accented focus at both positions in the lateral area, F(1, 19) < 1, ps > 0.05. At the end of the clause, however, accent on background information elicited a larger negativity (200-350 ms) compared to consistently unaccented background, F(1, 19) = 10.84, p < 0.01, η2p = 0.38, while there was no significant difference between accented and unaccented focus, F(1, 19) < 1, p > 0.05. Overall, the positive effect elicited by focus at both positions may reflect that listeners consume more cognitive resource to integrate focus to discourse compared to non-focus. Besides, accented words elicited a larger positivity than unaccented ones at both positions, indicating that prosodic prominence attracted more attention than unaccented information. Finally, accent on non-focus evoked a larger negativity compared to unaccented non-focus at the end of the clause. This result may reflect that listeners were sensitive to the information structure induced by pitch accent and the processing were influenced by the position of focus. In sum, the current results suggest that listeners make on-line use of both focus and pitch accent in various ways at different positions to build coherent representations of dialogues.

Keyword信息结构 重读 焦点 背景
Source Publication心理学报
Indexed ByCSCD ; CSSCI ; 中文核心期刊要目总览
Citation statistics
Document Type期刊论文
Corresponding Author李卫君; 杨玉芳
Corresponding Author AffilicationInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
李卫君,张晶晶,杨玉芳. 对比焦点的认知加工及其与重读的关系[J]. 心理学报,2017,49(9):1137-1149.
APA 李卫君,张晶晶,&杨玉芳.(2017).对比焦点的认知加工及其与重读的关系.心理学报,49(9),1137-1149.
MLA 李卫君,et al."对比焦点的认知加工及其与重读的关系".心理学报 49.9(2017):1137-1149.
Files in This Item:
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
对比焦点的认知加工及其与重读的关系_李卫(1011KB)期刊论文出版稿限制开放CC BY-NC-SAApplication Full Text
Related Services
Recommend this item
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[李卫君]'s Articles
[张晶晶]'s Articles
[杨玉芳]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[李卫君]'s Articles
[张晶晶]'s Articles
[杨玉芳]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[李卫君]'s Articles
[张晶晶]'s Articles
[杨玉芳]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.