PSYCH OpenIR  > 健康与遗传心理学研究室
损耗敏感性量表中文版的 修订与信效度研究
Alternative TitleRevision and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of Depletion Sensitivity Scale
唐义诚1,2; 王利刚1; 王经纬1,2; 高文斌1
Correspondent Emailgaowb@ psych. ac. cn
Source Publication中国心理卫生杂志

目的: 对损耗敏感性量表( DSS) 中文版进行修订并检验其信效度。方法: 选取北京市某高校499 名研究生,随机分为两部分,一部分( n = 249) 用于条目分析与探索性因子分析,另一部分( n =250) 用于验证性因子分析与信效度检验; 以自我调节疲劳量表( SRF-S) 、自我控制双系统量表( DMSCS)与青少年生活事件量表( ASLEC) 为效标检验效标效度; 2 周后随机选取其中280 名研究生进行重测以检验重测信度。结果: 量表中文版包含8 个条目,分为认知与行为2 个维度,共解释60. 7%的方差变异;验证性因素分析显示,双因素模型具有良好的拟合( χ2 /df = 4. 18,RMSEA = 0. 09,NFI = 0. 95,NNFI =0. 94,CFI = 0. 96,IFI = 0. 96,GFI = 0. 96,SRMR = 0. 05) 。量表总分及2 个维度得分与SRF-S 的各分量表得分、DMSC-S 冲动系统分量表得分、ASLEC 的各分量表( 除学习压力外) 得分均呈正相关( r = 0. 13 ~0. 55,均P < 0. 001) 。总量表的Cronbach α 系数为0. 80,2 个维度的Cronbach α 系数为0. 79、0. 73; 总量表的重测信度为0. 52,2 个维度的重测信度为0. 46、0. 58。结论: 损耗敏感性量表中文版具有良好的心理测量学指标,适宜在研究生群体中使用。

Other Abstract

Objective: To validate the Chinese Version of Depletion Sensitivity Scale ( DSS) and test its validity and reliability. Methods: A sample of 499 postgraduates coming from a university in Beijing was investigated with preliminary questionnaire,249 of them were assessed for exploratory factor analysis( EFA) and 250 of them were assessed for confirmatory factor analysis ( CFA) and testing of validity and reliability. The criterion validity was tested with the Self-Regulatory Fatigue Scale ( SRF-S) ,Dual-Mode of Self-Control Scale ( DMSC-S) and Adolescent Self-rating Life Events Check-list ( ASLEC) . Totally 280 students were retested for test-retest reliability with 2 week interval. Results: DSS was composed of 8 items in two factors,which were cognitive factor and behavioral factor. The two factors explained 60. 7% of the variances. The confirmatory factor analysis identified a two factor model ( χ2 /df = 4. 18,RMSEA = 0. 09,NFI = 0. 95,NNFI = 0. 94,CFI = 0. 96,IFI = 0. 96,GFI = 0. 96,SRMR =0. 05) . The scores of depletion sensitivity were positively correlated with the scores of cognitive fatigue,behavioral fatigue,emotional fatigue poor control,punished,loss,relationship pressure and adaption problem ( r = 0. 13 - 0. 55,Ps < 0. 001) . The Cronbach α coefficients were 0. 80 for the total questionnaire and 0. 79 and 0. 73 for the two factors. The test-retest reliability were 0. 52 for the total questionnaire and 0. 46 and 0. 58 for the two factors. Conclusion: It suggests that the Chinese version of Depletion Sensitivity Scale ( DSS) is reliable and valid enough to be applicable to measure the depletion sensitivity of Chinese graduate students.

Keyword损耗敏感性 自我损耗 效度 信度 心理测量学
DOI10. 3969 /j. issn. 1000 - 6729. 2017. 08. 011
Indexed ByCSCD
Citation statistics
Cited Times:1[CSCD]   [CSCD Record]
Document Type期刊论文
Corresponding Author高文斌
First Author AffilicationKey Laboratory of Mental Health, CAS
Corresponding Author AffilicationKey Laboratory of Mental Health, CAS
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
唐义诚,王利刚,王经纬,等. 损耗敏感性量表中文版的 修订与信效度研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志,2017,31(8):642-647.
APA 唐义诚,王利刚,王经纬,&高文斌.(2017).损耗敏感性量表中文版的 修订与信效度研究.中国心理卫生杂志,31(8),642-647.
MLA 唐义诚,et al."损耗敏感性量表中文版的 修订与信效度研究".中国心理卫生杂志 31.8(2017):642-647.
Files in This Item:
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
损耗敏感性量表中文版的修订与信效度研究_(272KB)期刊论文出版稿限制开放CC BY-NC-SAApplication Full Text
Related Services
Recommend this item
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[唐义诚]'s Articles
[王利刚]'s Articles
[王经纬]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[唐义诚]'s Articles
[王利刚]'s Articles
[王经纬]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[唐义诚]'s Articles
[王利刚]'s Articles
[王经纬]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.