Predicting risk decisions in a modified Balloon Analogue Risk Task: Conventional and single-trial ERP analyses

doi:10.3758/s13415-017-0555-3

PSYCH OpenIR > 社会与工程心理学研究室

	Predicting risk decisions in a modified Balloon Analogue Risk Task: Conventional and single-trial ERP analyses
	Gu, Ruolei1,2 ; Zhang, Dandan 3; Luo, Yi 4,5; Wang, Hongyan 1,2; Broster, Lucas S.6
第一作者	Gu, Ruolei
通讯作者邮箱	zhangdd05@gmail.com
心理所单位排序	1
摘要	Event-related potential (ERP) has the potential to reveal the temporal neurophysiological dynamics of risk decision-making, but this potential has not been fully explored in previous studies. When predicting risk decision with ERPs, most studies focus on between-trial analysis that reflects feedback learning, while within-trial analysis that could directly link option assessment with behavioral output has been largely ignored. Suitable task design is crucial for applying within-trial prediction. In this study, we used a modified version of the classic Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). In each trial of the task, participants made multiple rounds of decisions between a risky option (pump up the balloon) and a safe option (cash out). Behavioral results show that as the level of economic risk increased, participants were less willing to make a risky decision and also needed a longer response time to do so. In general, the ERP results showed distinct characteristics compared with previous findings based on between-trial prediction, particularly about the role of the P1 component. Specifically, both the P1 (amplitude and latency) and P3 (amplitude) components evoked by current outcomes predicted subsequent decisions. We suggest that these findings indicate the importance of selective attention (indexed by the P1) and motivational functions (indexed by the P3), which may help clarify the cognitive mechanism of risk decision-making. The theoretical significance of these findings is discussed.
关键词	Decision-making Risk preference Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) Event-related potential (ERP) P1 component P3 component
	2018-02-01
语种	英语
DOI	10.3758/s13415-017-0555-3
发表期刊	COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE
ISSN	1530-7026
卷号	18 期号:1 页码:99-116
期刊论文类型	Article
收录类别	SCI ; SSCI
WOS关键词	FEEDBACK-RELATED NEGATIVITY ; MEDIAL FRONTAL-CORTEX ; NEURAL MECHANISMS ; BRAIN ACTIVITY ; ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX ; SELECTIVE ATTENTION ; SENSATION SEEKING ; LOSS AVERSION ; YOUNG-ADULTS ; MAKING TASK
WOS标题词	Science & Technology ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine
WOS研究方向	Behavioral Sciences ; Neurosciences & Neurology
WOS类目	Behavioral Sciences ; Neurosciences
WOS记录号	WOS:000425984100008
Q分类	Q1
资助机构	National Natural Science Foundation of China(31571120 ; State Scholarship Fund(201504910062) ; National Institutes of Health(R25 MH060482) ; 31571124)
引用统计	被引频次：30[WOS] [WOS记录] [WOS相关记录]
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/25733
专题	社会与工程心理学研究室
通讯作者	Zhang, Dandan
作者单位	1.Inst Psychol, CAS Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China 2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China 3.Shenzhen Univ, Inst Affect & Social Neurosci, Shenzhen, Peoples R China 4.Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Cognit Neurosci & Learning, Beijing, Peoples R China 5.Virginia Tech Caril Res Inst, Roanoke, VA USA 6.Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat, San Francisco, CA USA
第一作者单位	中国科学院行为科学重点实验室
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Gu, Ruolei,Zhang, Dandan,Luo, Yi,et al. Predicting risk decisions in a modified Balloon Analogue Risk Task: Conventional and single-trial ERP analyses[J]. COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE,2018,18(1):99-116.
APA	Gu, Ruolei,Zhang, Dandan,Luo, Yi,Wang, Hongyan,&Broster, Lucas S..(2018).Predicting risk decisions in a modified Balloon Analogue Risk Task: Conventional and single-trial ERP analyses.COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE,18(1),99-116.
MLA	Gu, Ruolei,et al."Predicting risk decisions in a modified Balloon Analogue Risk Task: Conventional and single-trial ERP analyses".COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE 18.1(2018):99-116.

条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小	文献类型	版本类型	开放类型	使用许可
CABN-RA-17-003.R3.pd（2598KB）	期刊论文	作者接受稿	限制开放	CC BY-NC-SA	请求全文