PSYCH OpenIR  > 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室
A comparison of laboratory, clinical, and self-report measures of prospective memory in healthy adults and individuals with brain injury
Raskin, Sarah A.1; Shum, David H. K.2,3,4; Ellis, Judi5; Pereira, Antonia6; Mills, Ginger7
第一作者Sarah A. Raskin
2018
发表期刊JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
通讯作者邮箱sarah.raskin@trincoll.edu
ISSN1380-3395
文章类型Article
卷号40期号:5页码:423-436
摘要

Individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) have demonstrated deficits in prospective memory (PM) functioning when compared to healthy adults. These deficits have been measured using laboratory measures, clinical measures, and self-report questionnaires. However, PM has been shown to involve multiple cognitive processes and have a variety of stages. Thus, it is not known whether these measures all assess the same aspects of PM. Thus, this study was designed to measure the convergent validity of the three types of PM measures in both healthy adults and individuals with TBI. We aimed to investigate the convergent validity of the three types of tasks in two ways. First, we sought to investigate whether the PM deficits experienced by people with TBI are consistent across tasks. Second, we sought to examine the relationship between the three types of tasks. Results demonstrated that while all three types of measures were sensitive to PM deficits in TBI, there were differences in the aspects/processes of PM being measured. Data from the laboratory measure suggested a specific difficulty with detecting the correct cue. Data from the clinical measure suggested that TBI has a greater effect on time-based cues than event-based cues and that the primary deficit is a prospective intention retrieval deficit rather than the retrospective memory component. In addition, those with TBI did not differ from healthy adults when the time delay was short enough, suggesting that PM is not universally impaired. Data from the self-report questionnaire suggested that those with TBI are more sensitive to difficulties with basic activities of daily living rather than instrumental activities on daily living. These results are discussed in terms of rehabilitation techniques that could focus first on cue detection and use basic activities of daily living as outcome measures.

关键词Assessment Brain Injury Episodic Memory Prospective Memory Self-report
DOI10.1080/13803395.2017.1371280
收录类别SCI ; SSCI ; SSCI
语种英语
WOS研究方向Psychology ; Neurosciences & Neurology
WOS类目Psychology, Clinical ; Clinical Neurology ; Psychology
WOS记录号WOS:000431568400001
WOS标题词Social Sciences ; Science & Technology ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine
关键词[WOS]Intentions Screening-test ; Comprehensive Assessment ; Retrospective Memory ; Cognitive Impairment ; Retrieval-processes ; Normative Data ; Older-adults ; Virtual Week ; Event ; Time
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/26202
专题中国科学院心理健康重点实验室
作者单位1.Trinity Coll, Dept Psychol & Neurosci Program, Hartford, CT 06106 USA
2.Griffith Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
3.Griffith Univ, Sch Appl Psychol, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
4.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Neuropsychol & Appl Cognit Neurosci Lab, CAS Key Lab Mental Hlth, Beijing, Peoples R China
5.Univ Reading, Dept Psychol, Reading, Berks, England
6.Univ Chichester, Dept Psychol, Chichester, England
7.Univ Hartford, Dept Clin Physiol, Hartford, CT USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Raskin, Sarah A.,Shum, David H. K.,Ellis, Judi,et al. A comparison of laboratory, clinical, and self-report measures of prospective memory in healthy adults and individuals with brain injury[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY,2018,40(5):423-436.
APA Raskin, Sarah A.,Shum, David H. K.,Ellis, Judi,Pereira, Antonia,&Mills, Ginger.(2018).A comparison of laboratory, clinical, and self-report measures of prospective memory in healthy adults and individuals with brain injury.JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY,40(5),423-436.
MLA Raskin, Sarah A.,et al."A comparison of laboratory, clinical, and self-report measures of prospective memory in healthy adults and individuals with brain injury".JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 40.5(2018):423-436.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
A comparison of labo(1467KB)期刊论文出版稿限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览 请求全文
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Raskin, Sarah A.]的文章
[Shum, David H. K.]的文章
[Ellis, Judi]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Raskin, Sarah A.]的文章
[Shum, David H. K.]的文章
[Ellis, Judi]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Raskin, Sarah A.]的文章
[Shum, David H. K.]的文章
[Ellis, Judi]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: A comparison of laboratory, clinical, and self-report measures of prospective memory in healthy adults and individuals with brain injury.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。