PSYCH OpenIR  > 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室
Alternative TitleAccept or Reject?The Nudge Effect of Option Framing on Foundation Courses by Parents and Grandparents
刘隽1,2; 张震1,2; 孙彦2,3; 韩布新1,2; 陆勤4; 刘萍萍1,2
Conference Name第二十一届全国心理学学术会议
Source Publication摘要集-第二十一届全国心理学学术会议
Conference Date10.30-11.2
Conference Place北京
Country or Region第二十一届全国心理学学术会议
Contribution Rank1


Other Abstract

Abstract: Nowadays,extracurricular classes havealways beenthe research hotspots in areas such as education, economics and sociology. There are two types of curriculum: (1) enrichment courses which emphasize the development of the comprehensive abilities of students, such as interests and specialties; (2) the foundation courses which aim to improve the learning abilities and academic performance of students. However, when faced with the decision-making of extracurricular classes, primary school students and their parents often have irrational choices to interesting enrichment courses, rather than the foundation courses which will be rewarded in the future. How can we reduce these irrational choices? Two experiments were conducted to examine the impact of the option framing effects on curriculum decisions for consumers. In Experiment 1, primary school students, primary school parents and the grandparents were invited to examine the impact of the option framing effects on curriculum decisions for different decision makers. Experiment 2 was carried out in the real scene toexamthe nudge effect of option framing on foundation courses, taking the primary school parents as subjects. Results of both experiments showed that all participants selected more courses in rejection framing than in acceptance framing. However the preferences of courses were not influenced by the types of curriculum by grandparents, the mechanisms are unclear. The primary school parents preferred foundation courses in rejection framing than in acceptance framing. In contrary, they preferred more enrichment courses in acceptance framing. This study verifies the stability of the option framing effect and proves that the option framing effect is applicable toeducation decision-making field. The similarity between the types of curriculum (foundation / enrichment) and the types of product (utilitarian/hedonic) is verified from functional dimension, which provides insights on cross-domain theoretical clues for children's extracurricular education and activities. More importantly, it is found that adjusting the option framing can be used to improve parents’ rational choices, which make them choose the foundation courses. This research has significant real-world implications for both educators and families.

Keyword选项框架效应 启发式加工 课程类型 决策者角色
Document Type会议论文
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
刘隽,张震,孙彦,等. 接受还是拒绝?框架影响父辈和祖辈对孩子的课程选择[C],2018:185-187.
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Related Services
Recommend this item
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[刘隽]'s Articles
[张震]'s Articles
[孙彦]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[刘隽]'s Articles
[张震]'s Articles
[孙彦]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[刘隽]'s Articles
[张震]'s Articles
[孙彦]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.