PSYCH OpenIR  > 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室
加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(儿童修订版)的效度和信度检验
Alternative TitleValidity and reliability of the Chinese Version of the University of California at Los AngelesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index for DSM-IV (Revision 1,Children version)
付琳1,2; 程锦1,2; 吴苏曼1,2; 刘正奎1
First Author付琳
2018-02-10
Source Publication中国心理卫生杂志
Correspondent Emailliuzk@psych. ac. Cn
ISSN1000-6729
Subtype期刊论文
Volume32Issue:02Pages:160-165
Contribution Rank1
Abstract

目的:检验加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(儿童修订版)(UCLA PTSD-RI)在灾后儿童中的效度和信度。方法:选取辽宁省抚顺市受灾地区的6所中小学(4~9年级)学生1593人[年龄8~16岁,平均(11±2)岁],将其随机分为两部分,一部分(n=796)用于探索性因素分析,另一部分(n=797)用于验证性因素分析。使用抑郁-焦虑-压力量表简版(DASS-21)评估效标效度。结果:探索性因素分析显示共有3个因子,累计可解释的方差为50%;验证性因素分析表明三因素结构各项指标拟合良好(χ~2/df=3.87,GFI=0.93,RFI=0.96,CFI=097,NNFI=0.97,IFI=0.97,RMSEA=0.06)。量表的3个维度得分与DASS-21的3个维度得分呈正相关(r=0.52~0.70,均P<0.001)。量表的内部一致性信度和分半信度分别为0.90和0.87。结论:本研究提示,加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(儿童修订版)具有良好的效度和信度,可用于灾后儿童创伤后应激障碍的评估。

Other Abstract

Objective: To test the validity and reliability of the University of California at Los Angeles Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index for DSM-IV ( Revision 1,Children version) ( UCLA PTSD-RI) in Chinese Children after flood. Methods: On the principle of convenient sampling,the students were chosen from 6 schools in Liaoning Province where was hit by flood. Totally 1593 students [aged 8 - 16 years,average ( 11 ± 2) years of age]completed the UCLA PTSD-RI. They were randomly divided into two groups for exploratory factor analysis ( n =796) and confirmatory factor analysis ( n = 797) respectively. The 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale( DASS- 21) were used to evaluate the criterion validity. Results: The result of exploratory factor analysis indicated UCLA PTSD-RI consisted of 3 factors,accounting for 50% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis identified that a three-factor model fit well ( χ2 /df = 3. 87,GFI = 0. 93,RFI = 0. 96,CFI = 097,NNFI = 0. 97,IFI = 0. 97,RMSEA = 0. 06 ) . The scores of UCLA PTSD-RI subscales were positively correlated with the scores of DASS-21subscales ( r = 0. 52 - 0. 70,Ps < 0. 001) . The Cronbach' s α coefficient and the split-half reliability coefficient of UCLA PTSD-RI were 0. 90 and 0. 87,respectively. Conclusion: The Chinese Version of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-IV ( Revision 1,Children version) could be an effective instrument for assessing and diagnosing PTSD of Chinese children after disasters.

Keyword加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(儿童修订版) 儿童 创伤后应激障碍 效度 信度
DOI10. 3969 /j. issn. 1000 - 6729. 2018. 02. 013
Indexed ByCSCD
Language中文
CSCD IDCSCD:6161761
Citation statistics
Cited Times:1[CSCD]   [CSCD Record]
Document Type期刊论文
Identifierhttp://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/27678
Collection中国科学院心理健康重点实验室
Corresponding Author吴苏曼; 刘正奎
Affiliation1.中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室
2.中国科学院大学
First Author AffilicationInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Corresponding Author AffilicationInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
付琳,程锦,吴苏曼,等. 加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(儿童修订版)的效度和信度检验[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志,2018,32(02):160-165.
APA 付琳,程锦,吴苏曼,&刘正奎.(2018).加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(儿童修订版)的效度和信度检验.中国心理卫生杂志,32(02),160-165.
MLA 付琳,et al."加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(儿童修订版)的效度和信度检验".中国心理卫生杂志 32.02(2018):160-165.
Files in This Item:
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(263KB)期刊论文出版稿限制开放CC BY-NC-SAView Application Full Text
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[付琳]'s Articles
[程锦]'s Articles
[吴苏曼]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[付琳]'s Articles
[程锦]'s Articles
[吴苏曼]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[付琳]'s Articles
[程锦]'s Articles
[吴苏曼]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
File name: 加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(儿童修订版)的效度和信度检验.pdf
Format: Adobe PDF
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.