PSYCH OpenIR  > 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室
Alternative TitleA preliminary study of validity and reliability of the Chinese version of theParental Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire
李志红1; 杨林华2; 朱丽莎3,4; 祝卓宏3,4
First Author李志红
Correspondent Emailzhuzh@psych. ac. Cn
Source Publication中国心理卫生杂志
Contribution Rank3


Other Abstract

Objective: To revise the Chinese version of the Parental Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire ( PPFQ) and test its validity and reliability. Methods: Totally 1015 parents from 2 primary school of Beijing were recruited and asked to complete the Chinese version of PPFQ. Item analysis was conducted to identify valid items. The parents were randomly allocated into two groups where one subset ( n = 510) was used for exploratory factor analysis ( EFA) ,and the other ( n = 505) for confirmatory factor analysis ( CFA) and discriminant validity. In addition,responses of 389 participants selected by simple random sampling was assessed in criterion validity with the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire ( CFQ) ,Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Second Edition ( AAQ-Ⅱ) , Self-Rating Anxiety Scale ( SAS) ,Self-Rating Depression Scale ( SDS) ,Mindful Attention Awareness Scale ( MAAS) ,Trait Coping Style Questionnaire( TCSQ) and Conners Child Behavior Rating Scale ( CBRS) . Seven weeks later,225 of the participants were retested. Results: The exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 components, and explained 58. 1% of the total variance. The factor loading of items ranged between 0. 63 and 0. 86. The confirmatory factor analysis verified the 3-factors model ( χ2 /df = 1. 77,NFI = 0. 94,IFI = 0. 97,GFI = 0. 96,TLI = 0. 96,CFI = 0. 97,RMSEA = 0. 04) . Discriminant validity testing demonstrated the three revised factors had adequate discriminant validity in relation to one another ( Ps < 0. 01) . Criterion validity results showed that the total and subscale scores of the PPFQ were negatively correlated with the scores of CFQ,AAQ-Ⅱ,SAS,SDS,TCSQ-NC,CBRS ( r = - 0. 16 -- 0. 52,Ps < 0. 01 ) , and were positively correlated with the scores of MAAS, TCSQ-PC ( r = 0. 14 - 0. 37, Ps < 0. 01) . The total and subscale scores of the PPFQ demonstrated good internal consistency Cronbach's α were 0. 77 - 0. 86 and test-retest reliability coefficient were 0. 55 - 0. 75. Conclusion: It suggests the validity and reliability of the adapted Chinese version of the Parental Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire be satisfactory,and could be used in the clinical and research work in China.

Keyword接纳承诺疗法 父母 心理灵活性 效度 信度 心理测量学
DOI10. 3969 /j. issn. 1000 - 6729. 2018. 02. 014
Indexed ByCSCD
Citation statistics
Cited Times:1[CSCD]   [CSCD Record]
Document Type期刊论文
Corresponding Author祝卓宏
Corresponding Author AffilicationKey Laboratory of Mental Health, CAS
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
李志红,杨林华,朱丽莎,等. 父母养育心理灵活性问卷中文版的信效度初步研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志,2018,32(02):166-173.
APA 李志红,杨林华,朱丽莎,&祝卓宏.(2018).父母养育心理灵活性问卷中文版的信效度初步研究.中国心理卫生杂志,32(02),166-173.
MLA 李志红,et al."父母养育心理灵活性问卷中文版的信效度初步研究".中国心理卫生杂志 32.02(2018):166-173.
Files in This Item:
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
父母养育心理灵活性问卷中文版的信效度初步(323KB)期刊论文出版稿限制开放CC BY-NC-SAApplication Full Text
Related Services
Recommend this item
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[李志红]'s Articles
[杨林华]'s Articles
[朱丽莎]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[李志红]'s Articles
[杨林华]'s Articles
[朱丽莎]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[李志红]'s Articles
[杨林华]'s Articles
[朱丽莎]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.