慧眼识珠:创意识别的研究现状及未来方向 | |
其他题名 | A Literature Review of Idea Recognition Research andTheory: Past, Present and Future Directions |
齐舒婷1,2; 白新文1![]() | |
第一作者 | 齐舒婷 |
心理所单位排序 | 1 |
摘要 | 创意识别指对创意新颖性与实用性的评价与筛选,是连接创意产生和实施阶段的关键桥梁,引导组织创新的方向。本文系统整理了创意识别的研究现状和未来方向。基于现有文献,首先介绍了创意识别的内涵;而后提出了组织创新研究从创意产生到创意识别中的三大转变——参与主体、任务目标、作用机制;进而梳理了创意识别的评价主体、评价客体、人际与社会环境三类关键影响因素;随后总结了与创意识别相关的四个主要的研究视角;最后提出了未来研究需关注的六大重要议题。本文指出创意识别是组织创新研究的新方向,为本领域的研究和管理实践提供了新视角。 |
其他摘要 | One of the major limitations of the organizational creativity and innovation research and practices is that much attention has been paid to the processes and outcomes of creators’ idea generation and idea implementation. Nevertheless, how ideas are recognized by significant others has long been ignored. Thus, the current paper illustrates how idea recognition acts as the threshold for organizational innovation, and thoroughly reviews the antecedents, processes, consequences, and the main theoretical frameworks of idea recognition. We also propose new directions for future research. To begin with, we define the idea recognition as “the extent to which a person recognizes and/or selects a normatively new idea generated by others to be novel and useful”. Furthermore, we propose that when the focus shifts from idea generation to idea recognition, three main transformations will happen. These transformations are:(1)the change of participants of organizational innovation from primary creators(i.e., employees or teams)to key stakeholders(e.g., supervisors across organizational levels, members of decision-making committee, external clients or consumers);(2)the change of tasks of organizational innovation from “inventing or creating new things” to “recognizing the newness of things”; and(3)the change of the mechanism of organizational innovation from cognitive processes to social processes. Secondly, this paper summarizes how features of the three subsystems manifest their effects on evaluators’ idea recognition. The factors of the evaluator subsystem include evaluators’ individual differences, evaluators’ identities and roles, and the compositional features of teams/groups; the factors of the idea/creator subsystem are further divided into the features of ideas and the characteristics of creators; and the factors of the social/context subsystem include the interpersonal interactions between evaluators and creators, the characteristics of organizational and contextual settings, and the social norms and cultures. Thirdly, we illustrate four theoretical frameworks that serve as the overarching theories of the idea recognition research. The construal level theory is employed to reveal the relationship between the psychological distance and evaluators’ cognition processing; the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion is introduced to clarify the two pathways of cognitive processing in idea recognition; according to the regulatory focus theory, evaluators with promotion focus differ from those with prevention focus in terms of idea recognition outcomes; the motivated information processing theory is adopted to explain how the processes and outcomes of idea recognition are shaped by evaluators’ motivations. Finally, we propose six topics for future investigations, including the antecedents and their mechanism of decision-makers’ idea recognition, the effects of the competition and cooperation between evaluators on idea recognition, the impact of the interpersonal interactions between evaluators and creators on idea recognition, the influence of the ingroup/outgroup relationship between evaluators and creators on idea recognition, the multilevel investigation of organizational innovation strategies on idea recognition, and the integration and expansion of theoretical frameworks. The current paper contributes to the organizational creativity and innovation literature in three ways. Firstly, it introduces a new perspective for researchers and practitioners to shift the focus from idea generation to idea recognition. Secondly, it lays a solid foundation for future research by constructing an integrated research framework for idea recognition. Thirdly, it proposes six specific topics to ease the research agenda of idea recognition. |
关键词 | 组织创造力 组织创新 创意识别 创意产生 创意实施 |
2019-07-20 | |
语种 | 中文 |
DOI | 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2019.07.003 |
发表期刊 | 外国经济与管理
![]() |
ISSN | 1001-4950 |
卷号 | 41期号:07页码:42-57 |
期刊论文类型 | 期刊论文 |
项目简介 | 国家自然科学基金项目(71871214);; 国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0802600) |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | https://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/29954 |
专题 | 社会与工程心理学研究室 |
作者单位 | 1.中国科学院心理研究所 2.中国科学院大学心理学系 3.中央财经大学商学院 |
第一作者单位 | 中国科学院心理研究所 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 齐舒婷,白新文,林琳. 慧眼识珠:创意识别的研究现状及未来方向[J]. 外国经济与管理,2019,41(07):42-57. |
APA | 齐舒婷,白新文,&林琳.(2019).慧眼识珠:创意识别的研究现状及未来方向.外国经济与管理,41(07),42-57. |
MLA | 齐舒婷,et al."慧眼识珠:创意识别的研究现状及未来方向".外国经济与管理 41.07(2019):42-57. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 文献类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
慧眼识珠:创意识别的研究现状及未来方向.(1394KB) | 期刊论文 | 出版稿 | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 下载 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[齐舒婷]的文章 |
[白新文]的文章 |
[林琳]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[齐舒婷]的文章 |
[白新文]的文章 |
[林琳]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[齐舒婷]的文章 |
[白新文]的文章 |
[林琳]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论