PSYCH OpenIR  > 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室
Does Approach-Avoidance Behavior in Response to Ambiguous Cues Reflect Depressive Interpretation Bias? Related but Distinct
Lin, Xiao-Xiao1,2; Si, Shang-Wen3; Gao, Rui-Rui1,2; Sun, Ya-Bin1,2; Wang, Yu-Zheng1,2; Wang, Ning1,2; Luo, Fei1,2; Wang, Jin-Yan1,2
第一作者Lin, Xiao-Xiao
通讯作者邮箱wangjy@psych.ac.cn
心理所单位排序1
摘要

Background There has been a recent surge of interest in the development of the Judgement Bias Test (JBT) as a translational assay and objective measure of depressive interpretation bias. Judgement bias, namely the tendency of favoring an approach/avoidance response towards ambiguous cues, is thought to reflect a biased interpretation or anticipation of the cues. However, no study has examined the relationship between judgement bias and depressive interpretation bias. Methods We validated the JBT against established measurements of interpretation bias in a college sample (Study 1) and an adolescent sample (Study 2). Results In both samples, a negative judgement bias was significantly associated with a depressive interpretation bias. However, the strength of the associations was only moderate and failed to meet the minimum qualification of convergent validity. Conclusions Our results suggest that judgement bias and interpretation bias might be related but distinct. The JBT should not be used as an indirect assessment of interpretation bias in its current form, and it would be premature to claim that animal studies using the JBT could inform our understanding of cognitive biases in mood disorders. Nevertheless, the JBT might be useful for studying specific mechanisms, such as reward processing under ambiguity.

关键词Interpretation bias Depression Ambiguity Judgement bias test Approach-avoidance
2020-07-14
语种英语
DOI10.1007/s10608-020-10133-0
发表期刊COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH
ISSN0147-5916
卷号44页码:1091–1105
期刊论文类型实证研究
收录类别SSCI
出版者SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
WOS关键词NEGATIVE INTERPRETATION BIAS ; HAMILTON-PLEASURE SCALE ; INVENTORY-SHORT VERSION ; EMOTIONAL DISORDERS ; COGNITIVE BIAS ; RISK-TAKING ; AFFECT SCHEDULE ; ANXIETY ; MOOD ; VALIDATION
WOS研究方向Psychology
WOS类目Psychology, Clinical
WOS记录号WOS:000548466400001
WOS分区Q2
资助机构NNSF (National Natural Science Foundation of China) ; Scientific Foundation of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences ; CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology ; initiation fund of the CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/32256
专题中国科学院心理健康重点实验室
通讯作者Wang, Jin-Yan
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, CAS Key Lab Mental Hlth, 16 Lincui Rd, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
3.Beijing 101 Middle Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
第一作者单位中国科学院心理健康重点实验室
通讯作者单位中国科学院心理健康重点实验室
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Lin, Xiao-Xiao,Si, Shang-Wen,Gao, Rui-Rui,et al. Does Approach-Avoidance Behavior in Response to Ambiguous Cues Reflect Depressive Interpretation Bias? Related but Distinct[J]. COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH,2020,44:1091–1105.
APA Lin, Xiao-Xiao.,Si, Shang-Wen.,Gao, Rui-Rui.,Sun, Ya-Bin.,Wang, Yu-Zheng.,...&Wang, Jin-Yan.(2020).Does Approach-Avoidance Behavior in Response to Ambiguous Cues Reflect Depressive Interpretation Bias? Related but Distinct.COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH,44,1091–1105.
MLA Lin, Xiao-Xiao,et al."Does Approach-Avoidance Behavior in Response to Ambiguous Cues Reflect Depressive Interpretation Bias? Related but Distinct".COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH 44(2020):1091–1105.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Does Approach-Avoida(849KB)期刊论文出版稿限制开放CC BY-NC-SA请求全文
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Lin, Xiao-Xiao]的文章
[Si, Shang-Wen]的文章
[Gao, Rui-Rui]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Lin, Xiao-Xiao]的文章
[Si, Shang-Wen]的文章
[Gao, Rui-Rui]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Lin, Xiao-Xiao]的文章
[Si, Shang-Wen]的文章
[Gao, Rui-Rui]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。