PSYCH OpenIR  > 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室
行为公共管理学视角下公共决策的社会许可机制:“一提两抑”
Alternative TitleSocial license of public decision from the behavioral public administration perspective: Transparency effect and its moderation
张书维1; 申翊人1; 周洁2
First Author张书维
Correspondent Emailzhouj@psych.ac.cn
2020
Source Publication心理学报
ISSN0439-755X
Subtype期刊论文
Volume52Issue:02Pages:240-256
Contribution Rank2
Abstract

公共管理的本质是公共决策。"公共决策的社会许可"指当地民众对于公共决策的持续接受和支持程度,是公共决策合法性的基石。本研究借助"行为公共管理学"的理论视角,通过两个调查实验(N=354+354),一个现场调查(N=520),全面考察公共决策透明(过程透明和内容透明)与社会许可之间的因果关系,进而明确这一关系的作用边界。结果发现:1)决策过程透明与内容透明正向影响社会许可; 2)政府信任调节决策内容透明与社会许可的关系;3)结果依赖调节两类透明与社会许可的关系。基于这些结果,作者总结出正性的"决策透明效应"以及"谨慎的不介意"和"有选择的忽视"之双缓冲作用,即"一提两抑",以更好地理解公共决策的社会许可机制。

Other Abstract

The essence of public administration is public decision-making. Social license of public decision (SLPD) refers to the extent to which local people accept and support a public decision from government or public authorities. Lack of this license not only hinders the efficiency of government policy, but also affects the decision-making authority and long-term goals of society. Moreover, government transparency is regarded as an important factor to eliminate public decision-making dilemma and enhance administrative legitimacy both in value and democratic practices. This research explored the causal relationship between transparency of government decision-making (i.e., transparency in process and transparency in rational) and SLPD from the perspective of Behavioral Public Administration (BPA), which is a bridge linking Public Administration and Psychology. In other words, BPA is a new interdisciplinary sub-field of Public Administration from Psychology. The research of BPA mainly focuses on the process between government decision-making and citizen experience. In addition, based on the concept of bounded rationality and heuristic judgment as well as system justification theory, we built and tested the moderating roles of trust in government and outcome dependence between transparency of government decision-making and SLPD in two models. Outcome dependence is the extent to which someone is dependent on a powerful authority (i.e., the representative of a system) when that authority controls valued resources whose social and/or material outcome the person desires. This research includes three studies, two survey experiments (N = 354 + 354) and one field survey (N =520). The studies were conducted in China. The results showed that: First, transparency of governmental decision-making positively influenced SLPD. That is, for both transparency in process and transparency in rationale of government decision -making, the higher the transparency is, the higher the SLPD is. Second, trust in government moderated the relationship between transparency in rational and SLPD. Specifically, the positive relationship between transparency in rational and SLPD gets weakened when the trust in government is higher. Third, outcome dependence moderated the relationship between transparency of governmental decision-making and SLPD. Specifically, the positive relationship between two types of transparency and SLPD gets weakened when the outcome dependence is higher. Therefore, ―Transparency effects‖ of SLPD was proposed through the present research. In addi tion, ―cautious indifference‖ was used to indicate the moderating role of trust in government, and ―selective neglect‖ was used to indicate the moderating effect of outcome dependence. The theoretical contributions were embodied in three aspects: (1) defining a new concept (i.e., SLPD); (2) introducing a new perspective (i.e., BPA); (3) discovering a new mechanism (i.e., transparency effect and its moderators). Regarding the practical implications, this research could shed light on the transparency practice, and provides empirical evidence to government for further enhancing the legitimacy of public decisions.

Keyword行为公共管理学 内容透明 过程透明 政府信任 结果依赖 社会许可
DOI10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00240
Indexed ByCSCD ; CSSCI ; 中文核心期刊要目总览
Language中文
Project Intro.

国家社会科学基金青年项目(18CGL043)

CSCD IDCSCD:6673014
Citation statistics
Document Type期刊论文
Identifierhttp://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/32549
Collection中国科学院行为科学重点实验室
Corresponding Author周洁
Affiliation1.中山大学中国公共管理研究中心政治与公共事务管理学院
2.中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室
Corresponding Author AffilicationInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
张书维,申翊人,周洁. 行为公共管理学视角下公共决策的社会许可机制:“一提两抑”[J]. 心理学报,2020,52(02):240-256.
APA 张书维,申翊人,&周洁.(2020).行为公共管理学视角下公共决策的社会许可机制:“一提两抑”.心理学报,52(02),240-256.
MLA 张书维,et al."行为公共管理学视角下公共决策的社会许可机制:“一提两抑”".心理学报 52.02(2020):240-256.
Files in This Item:
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
行为公共管理学视角下公共决策的社会许可机(1201KB)期刊论文出版稿限制开放CC BY-NC-SAApplication Full Text
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[张书维]'s Articles
[申翊人]'s Articles
[周洁]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[张书维]'s Articles
[申翊人]'s Articles
[周洁]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[张书维]'s Articles
[申翊人]'s Articles
[周洁]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.