Development of the Mental Staleness Scale in College Students

PSYCH OpenIR > 健康与遗传心理学研究室

	Development of the Mental Staleness Scale in College Students
其他题名	Development of the Mental Staleness Scale in College Students
	Wei Ping 1; Yang Mimi 1; Chen Hongbo 2
摘要	Objective: Based upon literature and research work, a Mental Staleness Scale in College Students(MSS-CS) was designed in this work, and the reliability and validity were tested to determine the psychometric properties of this scale. Methods: 1500 questionnaires were tested in the first measurement, which contains 83 items. 1000 students were included in the formal measurement and 122 students were tested again four weeks later for investigating the test-retest reliability. Based on literatures review and opening questionnaire, original items were identified firstly. The formal scale was refined by using item analysis, parallel analysis, exploratory factor analysis(EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis(CFA). Results: MSS-CS included 17 items and was composed of three dimensions including cognitive staleness, emotional staleness, and control fatigue. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the scale had good fit index: χ~2/df=1.693, NFI=0.912, RFI=0.901, CFI=0.942,RMSEA=0.050. The internal consistency of MS-CS and the three sub-scales ranged from 0.881 to 0.738, and the test-retest coefficients were 0.854-0.798. There were significant positive correlations between total score and three dimensions(r=0.793~0.459) (absolute value) and among dimensions(r=0.317~0.388). The MSS-CS total score and three dimensions were significantly correlated with the criterion Maslach Burnout Inventory - Student Survey(MBI-SS) (r=0.465 ~ 0.819). Conclusion: The MSS-CS with three sub-structures has good psychometric properties in Chinese college students.
其他摘要	Objective: Based upon literature and research work, a Mental Staleness Scale in College Students(MSS-CS) was designed in this work, and the reliability and validity were tested to determine the psychometric properties of this scale. Methods: 1500 questionnaires were tested in the first measurement, which contains 83 items. 1000 students were included in the formal measurement and 122 students were tested again four weeks later for investigating the test-retest reliability. Based on literatures review and opening questionnaire, original items were identified firstly. The formal scale was refined by using item analysis, parallel analysis, exploratory factor analysis(EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis(CFA). Results: MSS-CS included 17 items and was composed of three dimensions including cognitive staleness, emotional staleness, and control fatigue. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the scale had good fit index: χ~2/df=1.693, NFI=0.912, RFI=0.901, CFI=0.942,RMSEA=0.050. The internal consistency of MS-CS and the three sub-scales ranged from 0.881 to 0.738, and the test-retest coefficients were 0.854-0.798. There were significant positive correlations between total score and three dimensions(r=0.793~0.459) (absolute value) and among dimensions(r=0.317~0.388). The MSS-CS total score and three dimensions were significantly correlated with the criterion Maslach Burnout Inventory - Student Survey(MBI-SS) (r=0.465 ~ 0.819). Conclusion: The MSS-CS with three sub-structures has good psychometric properties in Chinese college students.
关键词	大学生认知困乏情绪困乏控制感困乏
	2015
语种	英语
发表期刊	Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
ISSN	1005-3611
卷号	23 期号:3 页码:386-392
收录类别	CSCD
CSCD记录号	CSCD:5447694
引用统计
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	https://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/36583
专题	健康与遗传心理学研究室
作者单位	1.中国科学院心理研究所 2.西安电子科技大学
第一作者单位	中国科学院心理研究所
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Wei Ping,Yang Mimi,Chen Hongbo. Development of the Mental Staleness Scale in College Students[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology,2015,23(3):386-392.
APA	Wei Ping,Yang Mimi,&Chen Hongbo.(2015).Development of the Mental Staleness Scale in College Students.Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology,23(3),386-392.
MLA	Wei Ping,et al."Development of the Mental Staleness Scale in College Students".Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology 23.3(2015):386-392.