认知与发展心理学研究室知识库

目的修订中文版基本心理需要满足量表（BNSG—S），并检验其信效度。方法采用分层取样的方法对全国5个单位的6366名青年职工进行问卷调查，回收有效问卷6071份。通过项目分析筛选项目，对数据进行探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析检验问卷的结构效度，用幸福感指数量表来检验效标效度，并检验问卷的信度。结果经过3次探索性因素分析，最后得到的中文版BNSG—S有15个条目，包含4个因子，分别为：自主需要满足、自主需要满足受阻、归属需要满足、归属需要满足受阻，累计方差贡献率为63．95％。验证性因素分析所得指标均符合心理测量学的要求（RMSEA=0．056，NFI=0．97，NNFI=0．96，CFI=0．97）。中文版BNSG—S总分与幸福感指数量表的相关系数为0．50（P〈0．01），各维度与幸福感指数量表也显著相关。中文版BNSG—S的Cronbachα系数为0．76，其中，各因子的Cronbachα系数分别为0．80，0．67，0．83，0．80。结论基本心理需要满足量表中文版具有较好的信效度，包括四个因子，可作为测量中国人基本心理需要满足的工具。

Objective To revise and test the reliability and validity of the Chinese vision of the Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale （BNSG-S）. Methods Totally 6366 youth workers from 5 organizations were recruited with stratified sampling method. Participants were asked to complete the Chinese vision of BNSG-S. Item analysis was conducted to identify valid items and revise the scale. Then the construct validity of the revised scale was tested through exploratory- and confirmatory factor analysis （EFA ＆ CFA）. The criterion validity was tested with the Index of Well-being Scale. Finally the reliability of the scale was examined. Results The revised scale consists of 15 items with 4 factorssatisfied state of autonomy need, blocked state of autonomy need, satisfied state of relatedness need, blocked state of relatedness need. The four factors explained 63.95% of the total variance. Besides, the CFA results demonstrated a satisfactory construct validity of the scale （ RMSEA = 0. 056, NFI = 0.97, NNFI = 0.96, CFI = 0.97 ）. The correlation coefficients between the scale and the Index of Well-being Scale was 0.50 （P〈0. 01 ） and each factor was significantly correlated to the Index of Well-being Scale. The Cronbachg α coefficients of the Chinese vision of BNSG-S was 0.76, and those of its 4 factors were 0.80, 0.67,0.83 and 0.80 respectively. Conclusion The Chinese vision of BNSG-S with 4 factors has good reliability and validity, demonstrating it a valid tool to measure Chinese basic needs satisfaction.