Institutional Repository, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
| 金钱态度量表(MAS)的信度和效度验证 | |
| Alternative Title | Development of Money Attitude Scale and Research on Its Validity and Reliability |
| 洪雷; 曹慧; 方格 | |
| 2009 | |
| Source Publication | 中国临床心理学杂志
 |
| ISSN | 1005-3611 |
| Volume | 17Issue:2Pages:139-141 |
| Abstract | 目的:检验金钱态度量表中文版的信度和效度。方法:采用中文版《金钱态度量表》、《社会公理问卷》对370名研究生进行问卷调查。结果:验证性因素分析结果显示量表极好地验证了原量表的四因素结构(χ2=323.33,df=164,RMSEA=0.051)。四个维度的内部一致性系数和两周后的重测信度都大于0.60。四维度间有低到中等的相关(r从0.13到0.40,Ρ<0.05)。此外,与性别、社会经济地位及社会信念各维度间皆有一定相关。结论:金钱态度量表中文版具有较好的信度、结构效度和聚合与区分效度。 |
| Keyword | 金钱态度量表 社会信念 社会经济地位 |
| Subject Area | 心理测量 |
| Language | 中文 |
| Note | Objective:To test the validity and reliability of the Money Attitude Scale(MAS) adapted from English.Methods:317 graduates from Chinese Academy of Sciences took both Money Attitude Scale and Social Axioms Survey(SAS).Results:Confirmatory factor analysis proves that the structure of the new MAS fit for the 4-factor structure of the English version Money Attitude Scale(χ2 =323.33,df =164,RMSEA=0.051).The Cronbach's α of coefficient and of the retest in 2 weeks of the 4 factors are higher than 0.60.The 4 factors are related in a middle degree(from 0.13 to 0.40,P< 0.05).What is more,the 4 factors are related to subjects' sex,socioeconomic status and social belief.Conclusion:The adapted MAS has a good reliability,structural validity,convergent validity and discriminate validity. |
| Document Type | 期刊论文 |
| Identifier | http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/4146 |
| Collection | 中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010) |
| Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | 洪雷,曹慧,方格. 金钱态度量表(MAS)的信度和效度验证[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(2):139-141. |
| APA | 洪雷,曹慧,&方格.(2009).金钱态度量表(MAS)的信度和效度验证.中国临床心理学杂志,17(2),139-141. |
| MLA | 洪雷,et al."金钱态度量表(MAS)的信度和效度验证".中国临床心理学杂志 17.2(2009):139-141. |
| Files in This Item: | Download All | |||||
| File Name/Size | DocType | Version | Access | License | ||
| 金钱态度量表_MAS_的信度和效度验证.（286KB） | 开放获取 | -- | View Download | |||
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment