中国科学院心理研究所机构知识库

目的：检验主动控制感量表（Sense of Agency Scale, SoAS）中文版的信度和效度。方法：通过网络平台施测得到有效问卷1800份，随机分成两个独立样本后分别执行项目分析、探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析、结构效度及信度的分析。结果：根据项目分析的结果删除2道题目，得到一个9题量表。探索性因素分析得到一个两因子结构模型。验证性因素分析的结果表明模型区分度良好,拟合度指标为：χ2/df=2.54,CFI=0.971,TLI=0.960,RMSEA=0.041,SRMR=0.036。内部一致性信度系数为0.819，分半信度系数为0.661，重测信度系数为0.713。主动控制感量表与一般自我效能感量表、控制感量表的相关系数分别为0.587、0.696(P<0.01)。结论：中文版主动控制感量表具有良好的信效度，可以作为有效的主动控制感测量工具。

Objective: This study aimed to introduce the Sense of Agency Scale (SoAS) as a new measurement for Chinese researchers, and test the reliability and validity of Chinese version. Methods: A sample of 1, 800 participants (904 females; Mean age=33.35, SD=9.52) were recruited via an online network platform and completed the 11-item version of C-SoAS. The total sample were randomly divided into two samples for subsequent analyses. Results: Nine items were retained after the item analysis, and two subscales (i.e., SoPA and SoNA) were extracted via the exploratory factor analysis. The two-facet model were also supported by the results of confirmatory factor analysis (χ2 /df=2.54, CFI=0.971, TLI=0.960, RMSEA=0.041, SRMR=0.036). Each of the two factors’AVE value was larger than the correlation coefficient of the two factors (r 2 =0.383), CR>0.7. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the scale was 0.819, the split-half reliability was 0.661 and testretest reliability coefficient was 0.713. The score of the sense of agency scale was significantly correlated with self-efficacy (GSES), sense of control(The Sense of Control Scale), and the coefficients were 0.587、0.696（P<0.01）respectively. Conclusion: C-SoAS has good reliability and validity, and can be used as a reliable tool to measure one’s sense of agency among Chinese.

国家自然科学基金（32071055,62061136001）;; 国家社会科学基金重大项目（19ZDA363）