Measurement invariance of the driving inattention scale (ARDES) across 7 countries

doi:10.1016/j.aap.2023.107412

PSYCH OpenIR

	Measurement invariance of the driving inattention scale (ARDES) across 7 countries
	Castro, Candida 1,8; Doncel, Pablo 1; Ledesma, Ruben D.2,3; Montes, Silvana A.2,3; Barragan, D. Daniela 4; Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar 5; Bianchi, Alessandra 6; Kauer, Natalia 6; Qu, Weina 7; Padilla, Jose-Luis 1
通讯作者	Castro, Candida(candida@ugr.es)
摘要	The Attention-Related Driving Errors Scale (ARDES) is a self-report measure of individual differences in driving inattention. ARDES was originally developed in Spanish (Argentina), and later adapted to other countries and languages. Evidence supporting the reliability and validity of ARDES scores has been obtained in various different countries. However, no study has been conducted to specifically examine the measurement invariance of ARDES measures across countries, thus limiting their comparability. Can different language versions of ARDES provide comparable measures across countries with different traffic regulations and cultural norms? To what extent might cultural differences prevent researchers from making valid inferences based on ARDES measures? Using Alignment Analysis, the present study assessed the approximate invariance of ARDES measures in seven countries: Argentina (n = 603), Australia (n = 378), Brazil (n = 220), China (n = 308). Spain (n = 310), UK (n = 298), and USA (n = 278). The three-factor structure of ARDES scores (differentiating driving errors occurring at Navigation, Manoeuvring and Control levels) was used as the target theoretical model. A fixed alignment analysis was conducted to examine approximate measurement invariance. 12.3 % of the intercepts and 0.8 % of the item factor loadings were identified as non-invariant, averaging 8.6 % of non-invariance. Despite substantial differences among the countries, sample recruitment or representativeness, study results support resorting to ARDES measures to make comparisons across the country samples. Thus, the range of cultures, laws and collision risk across these 7 countries provides a demanding assessment for a cultural-free inattention while-driving. The alignment analysis results suggest that ARDES measures reach near equivalence among the countries in the study. We hope this study will serve as a basis for future cross-cultural research on driving inattention using ARDES.
关键词	Distracted driver Proneness to distraction Navigation errors Manoeuvring errors Control errors Planning errors
	2024-02-01
语种	英语
DOI	10.1016/j.aap.2023.107412
发表期刊	ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION
ISSN	0001-4575
卷号	195 页码:9
收录类别	SCI
资助项目	Grant MCIN/AEI ; State Research Agency (SRA) (MCIN/AEI/), Spain[PID2020-113978RB-I00] ; State Research Agency (SRA) (MCIN/AEI/), Spain[PDC2021-12944-I00] ; European Regional Fund ERDF A way of making Europe ; European Union ; European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR ; Junta de Andalucia I + D + I Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucia, Spain[P20_00338] ; Junta de Andalucia I + D + I Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucia, Spain[A-SEJ-114-UGR20] ; Junta de Andalucia I + D + I Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucia, Spain[PYC20 RE 022 UGR] ; Plan Nacional de Drogas (Ministerio de Sanidad)[PND-020-019] ; Motor Accident Insurance Commission (MAIC) Queensland ; Australian Research Council[DE200101079]
出版者	PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
WOS关键词	ERRORS SCALE ; DRIVER DISTRACTION ; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES ; ATTENTION ; VALIDATION ; BEHAVIOR ; ADAPTATION ; PERFORMANCE ; PRONENESS ; CRASHES
WOS研究方向	Engineering ; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ; Social Sciences - Other Topics ; Transportation
WOS类目	Ergonomics ; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ; Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary ; Transportation
WOS记录号	WOS:001132966700001
资助机构	Grant MCIN/AEI ; State Research Agency (SRA) (MCIN/AEI/), Spain ; European Regional Fund ERDF A way of making Europe ; European Union ; European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR ; Junta de Andalucia I + D + I Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucia, Spain ; Plan Nacional de Drogas (Ministerio de Sanidad) ; Motor Accident Insurance Commission (MAIC) Queensland ; Australian Research Council
引用统计
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/46789
通讯作者	Castro, Candida
作者单位	1.Univ Granada, Fac Psychol, CIMCYC Mind Brain & Behav Res Ctr, Granada, Spain 2.CONICET Natl Sci & Tech Res Council, IPSIBAT Inst Psicol Basica Aplicada & Tecnol, Buenos Aires, Argentina 3.Univ Nacl Mar Plata, Mar Del Plata, Argentina 4.George Mason Univ, Fairfax, VA USA 5.Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands 6.UFPR Fed Univ Parana, Curitiba, Brazil 7.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, CAS Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China 8.Univ Granada, Fac Psicol, CIMCYC Mind Brain & Behav Res Ctr, Dept Psicol Expt, Campus Cartuja S-N, Granada 18197, Spain
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Castro, Candida,Doncel, Pablo,Ledesma, Ruben D.,et al. Measurement invariance of the driving inattention scale (ARDES) across 7 countries[J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION,2024,195:9.
APA	Castro, Candida.,Doncel, Pablo.,Ledesma, Ruben D..,Montes, Silvana A..,Barragan, D. Daniela.,...&Padilla, Jose-Luis.(2024).Measurement invariance of the driving inattention scale (ARDES) across 7 countries.ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION,195,9.
MLA	Castro, Candida,et al."Measurement invariance of the driving inattention scale (ARDES) across 7 countries".ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION 195(2024):9.