Whose side are you on? Relational orientations and their impacts on side-taking among Dutch and Chinese employees
Yang, Huadong1; Van de Vliert, Evert2; Shi, Kan3; Huang, Xu4
摘要Informal relationships often influence employees who intervene in an interpersonal conflict between colleagues. We investigate and report the effects of relational orientations (reciprocity orientation and communal orientation) on employee preference of choosing sides between an acquaintance and a friend in a workplace dispute in The Netherlands and China. A scenario study was conducted among 104 Dutch and 105 Chinese employees. As hypothesized, the results indicate that employees, especially Dutch employees, with an interest-concerned reciprocity orientation tend to side with the acquaintance who has a greater potential to return the favour. By contrast, employees, especially Chinese, with a sharing-concerned communal orientation tend to side with their workplace friend. Explanations and implications of the findings are discussed.; Informal relationships often influence employees who intervene in an interpersonal conflict between colleagues. We investigate and report the effects of relational orientations (reciprocity orientation and communal orientation) on employee preference of choosing sides between an acquaintance and a friend in a workplace dispute in The Netherlands and China. A scenario study was conducted among 104 Dutch and 105 Chinese employees. As hypothesized, the results indicate that employees, especially Dutch employees, with an interest-concerned reciprocity orientation tend to side with the acquaintance who has a greater potential to return the favour. By contrast, employees, especially Chinese, with a sharing-concerned communal orientation tend to side with their workplace friend. Explanations and implications of the findings are discussed.
学科领域文化心理学
2008-12-01
语种英语
发表期刊JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN0963-1798
卷号81期号:4页码:713-731
期刊论文类型Article
收录类别SSCI
WOS记录号WOS:000262400300007
引用统计
被引频次:10[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/5839
专题中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010)
作者单位1.Univ Twente, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
2.Univ Groningen, Dept Social & Org Psychol, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
3.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Ctr Social & Econ Behav, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
4.Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Management & Mkt, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Yang, Huadong,Van de Vliert, Evert,Shi, Kan,et al. Whose side are you on? Relational orientations and their impacts on side-taking among Dutch and Chinese employees[J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY,2008,81(4):713-731.
APA Yang, Huadong,Van de Vliert, Evert,Shi, Kan,&Huang, Xu.(2008).Whose side are you on? Relational orientations and their impacts on side-taking among Dutch and Chinese employees.JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY,81(4),713-731.
MLA Yang, Huadong,et al."Whose side are you on? Relational orientations and their impacts on side-taking among Dutch and Chinese employees".JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 81.4(2008):713-731.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Theoretical Criminol(96KB) 开放获取--浏览 下载
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Yang, Huadong]的文章
[Van de Vliert, Evert]的文章
[Shi, Kan]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Yang, Huadong]的文章
[Van de Vliert, Evert]的文章
[Shi, Kan]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Yang, Huadong]的文章
[Van de Vliert, Evert]的文章
[Shi, Kan]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: Theoretical Criminology-2009-Hagan-503-11.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。