Institutional Repository, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Whose side are you on? Relational orientations and their impacts on side-taking among Dutch and Chinese employees | |
Yang, Huadong1; Van de Vliert, Evert2; Shi, Kan3; Huang, Xu4 | |
摘要 | Informal relationships often influence employees who intervene in an interpersonal conflict between colleagues. We investigate and report the effects of relational orientations (reciprocity orientation and communal orientation) on employee preference of choosing sides between an acquaintance and a friend in a workplace dispute in The Netherlands and China. A scenario study was conducted among 104 Dutch and 105 Chinese employees. As hypothesized, the results indicate that employees, especially Dutch employees, with an interest-concerned reciprocity orientation tend to side with the acquaintance who has a greater potential to return the favour. By contrast, employees, especially Chinese, with a sharing-concerned communal orientation tend to side with their workplace friend. Explanations and implications of the findings are discussed.; Informal relationships often influence employees who intervene in an interpersonal conflict between colleagues. We investigate and report the effects of relational orientations (reciprocity orientation and communal orientation) on employee preference of choosing sides between an acquaintance and a friend in a workplace dispute in The Netherlands and China. A scenario study was conducted among 104 Dutch and 105 Chinese employees. As hypothesized, the results indicate that employees, especially Dutch employees, with an interest-concerned reciprocity orientation tend to side with the acquaintance who has a greater potential to return the favour. By contrast, employees, especially Chinese, with a sharing-concerned communal orientation tend to side with their workplace friend. Explanations and implications of the findings are discussed. |
学科领域 | 文化心理学 |
2008-12-01 | |
语种 | 英语 |
发表期刊 | JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY |
ISSN | 0963-1798 |
卷号 | 81期号:4页码:713-731 |
期刊论文类型 | Article |
收录类别 | SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000262400300007 |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/5839 |
专题 | 中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010) |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Twente, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands 2.Univ Groningen, Dept Social & Org Psychol, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands 3.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Ctr Social & Econ Behav, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 4.Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Management & Mkt, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Yang, Huadong,Van de Vliert, Evert,Shi, Kan,et al. Whose side are you on? Relational orientations and their impacts on side-taking among Dutch and Chinese employees[J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY,2008,81(4):713-731. |
APA | Yang, Huadong,Van de Vliert, Evert,Shi, Kan,&Huang, Xu.(2008).Whose side are you on? Relational orientations and their impacts on side-taking among Dutch and Chinese employees.JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY,81(4),713-731. |
MLA | Yang, Huadong,et al."Whose side are you on? Relational orientations and their impacts on side-taking among Dutch and Chinese employees".JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 81.4(2008):713-731. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 文献类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
Theoretical Criminol(96KB) | 开放获取 | -- | 浏览 下载 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论