PSYCH OpenIR  > 中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010)
整合模型还是启发式模型?从齐当别模型视角进行的检验
汪祚军1; 欧创巍2; 李纾1
Correspondent Emaillishu@psych.ac.cn
Contribution Rank1
Abstract

实验从齐当别模型的视角,通过对决策过程反应时的考察分别对以累积预期理论(cumulative prospect theory)为代表的整合模型和启发式模型家族的重要成员--占优启发式模型(priority heuristic)--进行检验。结果表明,决策过程反应时并未随着占优启发式模型所假定的决策步骤的增加而变慢;也未随着选项之间整体值差值的变大而变快;模糊决策过程的反应时反而快于风险决策过程的反应时。无论是以累积预期理论为代表的整合模型还是占优启发式模型均不能满意地描述和解释人们的实际决策过程,而齐当别模型则能解释大部分实验结果。文章建议多角度、多指标探讨人们的决策过程,检验、修改、完善,以及建立新的启发式模型或决策过程模型(process model),以增进对人们如何进行风险决策的理解。

Other Abstract

Theories intended to describe decision making under risk and uncertainty can be classified as two families according to their theoretical basis:the integrative model and heuristic model.The integrative model postulates that the decision maker is both willing and able to combine information from different dimensions through two fundamental processes:weighting and summing.The heuristic model assumes that people do not integrate these kinds of information but rely on a repertoire of simple decision strategies—called heuristics—to make inferences,choices,estimations,and other decisions.A total of four experiments were conducted to compare these two sets of competing models from the view of the equate-to-differentiate model(Li,1994,2004a,2004b) by using a response time approach.Experiment 1 re-examined the priority heuristic by using the decision questions employed by Brandstatter,Gigerenzer and Hertwig(2006),but failed to duplicate their results.The priority heuristic predicted that the increase of reasons(steps) required would be associated with the increase of time for making a choice.Experiment 2 tested the priority heuristic by manipulating the number of reasons(steps) assumed by the priority heuristic and the difference between two options on the best-outcome/worst-outcome dimension assumed by the equate-to-differentiate model.It was revealed that the decision time did not increase with the increasing number of reasons(steps) assumed by the priority heuristic but decreased with the increased difference between two options on the best-outcome/worst-outcome dimension.These results obtained in Experiments 1 and 2 were not friendly to the priority heuristic model.Experiments 3 and 4 were designed to test the integrative model.Experiment 3 tested the integrative model by comparing the decision time under risk and under ambiguity.Interestingly,the average decision time under risk was much longer than that under ambiguity.This was contrary to the implications of the integrative model because integrating an ambiguous probability with a given outcome will take longer time than integrating an exact probability with a given outcome to give an overall value or utility.Experiment 4 tested the integrative model by manipulating the difference between CPT(Cumulative Prospect Theory) values and the difference between two options on the best-outcome/worst-outcome dimension.The results showed that the decision time did not decrease with the increased difference between the CPT values but decreased with the increased difference between two options on the best-outcome/worst-outcome dimension,which were not consistent with integrative model but consistent with the equate-to-differentiate model.In sum,neither integrative model nor priority heuristic could help account for the data on choice process that we observed.Future work may focus on testing these two sets of models by employing methods which can provide a much richer description of the decision process than the response time approach employed in the present paper.

Keyword整合模型 启发式模型 齐当别模型 决策过程 反应时
Subject Area认知心理学
2010
Language中文
Source Publication心理学报
ISSN0439-755X
Volume42Issue:8Pages:821-833
Subtype实证研究
Indexed ByCSCD ; CSSCI ; 中文核心期刊要目总览
Funding Project三室李纾课题组
CSCD IDCSCD:4031277
Citation statistics
Cited Times:9[CSCD]   [CSCD Record]
Document Type期刊论文
Identifierhttp://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/6672
Collection中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010)
Corresponding Author李纾
Affiliation1.中国科学院心理研究所
2.中山大学
First Author AffilicationInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Corresponding Author AffilicationInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
汪祚军,欧创巍,李纾. 整合模型还是启发式模型?从齐当别模型视角进行的检验[J]. 心理学报,2010,42(8):821-833.
APA 汪祚军,欧创巍,&李纾.(2010).整合模型还是启发式模型?从齐当别模型视角进行的检验.心理学报,42(8),821-833.
MLA 汪祚军,et al."整合模型还是启发式模型?从齐当别模型视角进行的检验".心理学报 42.8(2010):821-833.
Files in This Item: Download All
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
20101129111400整合模型还是(404KB)期刊论文出版稿开放获取CC BY-NC-SAView Download
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[汪祚军]'s Articles
[欧创巍]'s Articles
[李纾]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[汪祚军]'s Articles
[欧创巍]'s Articles
[李纾]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[汪祚军]'s Articles
[欧创巍]'s Articles
[李纾]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
File name: 20101129111400整合模型还是占优启发式模型.pdf
Format: Adobe PDF
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.