Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: A meta-analysis
Cuijpers, Pim1,2; Li, Juan3; Hofmann, Stefan G.4; Andersson, Gerhard5,6; Pim Cuijpers
2010-08-01
发表期刊CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
ISSN0272-7358
文章类型Review
卷号30期号:6页码:768-778
摘要It is not well-known whether self-report measures and clinician-rated instruments for depression result in comparable outcomes in research on psychotherapy. We conducted a meta-analysis in which randomized controlled trials were included examining the effects of psychotherapy for adult depression. Only studies were included in which both a self-report and a clinician-rated instrument were used. We calculated the effect size (Hedges' g) based on the self-report measures, the effect size based on the clinician-rated instruments, and the difference between these two effect sizes (Delta g). A total of 48 studies including a total of 2462 participants was included in the meta-analysis. The differential effect size was Delta g=0.20 (95% CI: 0.10-0.30), indicating that clinician-rated instruments resulted in a significantly higher effect size than self-report instruments from the same studies. When we limited the effect size analysis to those studies comparing the HRSD with the BDI, the differential effect was somewhat smaller, but still statistically significant (Delta g=0.15; 95% CI: 0.03-0.27). This meta-analysis has made it clear that clinician-rated and self-report measures of improvement following psychotherapy for depression are not equivalent. Different symptoms may be more suitable for self-report or ratings by clinicians and in clinical trials it is probably best to include both. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
关键词Depression Major depression Meta-analysis Self-report Clinician-rated
学科领域医学心理学
收录类别SSCI
语种英语
资助项目一室李娟课题组
WOS记录号WOS:000280573600013
引用统计
被引频次:93[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/7015
专题中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010)
通讯作者Pim Cuijpers
作者单位1.Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Clin Psychol, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
2.Vrije Univ Amsterdam, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
3.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Key Lab Mental Hlth, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
4.Boston Univ, Dept Psychol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
5.Linkoping Univ, Swedish Inst Disabil Res, Dept Behav Sci & Learning, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
6.Karolinska Inst, Psychiat Sect, Dept Clin Neurosci, Stockholm, Sweden
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Cuijpers, Pim,Li, Juan,Hofmann, Stefan G.,et al. Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: A meta-analysis[J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW,2010,30(6):768-778.
APA Cuijpers, Pim,Li, Juan,Hofmann, Stefan G.,Andersson, Gerhard,&Pim Cuijpers.(2010).Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: A meta-analysis.CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW,30(6),768-778.
MLA Cuijpers, Pim,et al."Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: A meta-analysis".CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW 30.6(2010):768-778.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Cuijpers, Pim]的文章
[Li, Juan]的文章
[Hofmann, Stefan G.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Cuijpers, Pim]的文章
[Li, Juan]的文章
[Hofmann, Stefan G.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Cuijpers, Pim]的文章
[Li, Juan]的文章
[Hofmann, Stefan G.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。