中国科学院心理健康重点实验室知识库

目的:检验真实性量表(Authenticity Scale)在中国青少年群体中的信效度。方法:用真实性量表中文版对1475名青少年进行测试。被试均同时完成主观幸福感、自尊、人生意义感及抑郁-焦虑-压力量表(DASS)的指标测量。五个月后对初测样本随机抽取168人进行重测。结果:探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析结果支持了真实性量表的三因素模型;真实性总分及其三个维度(自我疏离、接受外部影响、真实的生活)的内部一致性系数分别为0.775、0.817、0.764、0.679,重测信度分别为0.738、0.622、0.634、0.698;相关分析发现,真实性总分及其子维度之一(真实的生活)与情感幸福、生活满意度、自尊、人生意义感呈显著正相关,与DASS总分及其各分量表抑郁、焦虑、压力呈显著负相关;而真实性的另两个子维度(自我疏离、接受外部影响)与情感幸福、生活满意度、自尊、人生意义感呈显著负相关,与DASS总分及其各分量表抑郁、焦虑、压力呈显显著正相关。结论:中文版真实性量表在我国青少年群体中具有良好的信效度,可以作为开展我国青少年真实性相关研究的适宜工具。

To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Authenticity Scale in adolescents. Methods: 1475 adolescents were selected to complete the Chinese version of Authenticity Scale. Meanwhile, participants were examined in these indexes of subjective well-being, self-esteem, meaning in life and DASS. After 5 months, 168 participants of the pretest sample were randomly selected to examine the test-retest reliability. R2SUItS: Both EFA and CFA supported the three-factor structure model of the Authenticity Scale. Cronbach’s a for the Authenticity Scale and its three dimensions were 0.775, 0.817, 0.764 and 0.679 respectively, while the test-retest reliability were 0.738 , 0.622, 0.634 and 0.698 respectively. Moreover, the total score of adolescents’ authenticity and its one dimension-authentic living were both positively correlated to subjective well-being, self-esteem and meaning in life, whereas negatively correlated to the total score of DASS and its three subscales-depression, anxiety and stress. The two other dimensions of Authenticity Scale, namely, self-alienation and accepting external influence showed the opposite correlations to these indexes. Conclusion: The Chinese version of Authenticity Scale is reliable, valid, and suitable for measuring the authenticity of Chinese adolescents.