PSYCH OpenIR  > 健康与遗传心理学研究室
Thesis Advisor张建新
Degree Grantor中国科学院大学
Place of Conferral中国科学院心理研究所
Degree Name理学博士
Degree Discipline医学心理学
Keyword高级控制功能 特质愤怒 社会情绪控制 反应时技术 执行功能



结果发现:(1)自我控制在中国被试中也更加适合用两维结构来描述,即止动控制和启动控制;(2)止动控制和启动控制都可以独立地预测特质愤怒,其中止动控制可以通过“控制外怒”与特质愤怒有关联;而启动控制既可以通过“控制外怒”,也可以通过“控制内怒”与特质愤怒有关联;(3 )两种认知控制(敌意启动的认知控制&敌意信息的注意转移)互相关联,但两者均与社会情绪控制没有关联,也与特质愤怒没有关联。

Other Abstract

High levels of trait anger are associated with a variety of adverse consequences such as violence, cardiovascular disease and problematic health behaviors and so on. To help people with bad temper get away from these adverse conditions, it is important to explore the mechanism behind trait anger. Psychologist found that individual differences in 3 cognitive processes jointly contribute to a person's level of trait anger and reactive aggression, including hostile interpretation, ruminative attention, and effortful control. Hostile interpretation causes anger, ruminative attention exasperates anger, and effortful control regulates anger.

Plenty of empirical evidences showed that high levels of effortful control are associated with low levels of trait anger, and revealing the cognitive basis of trait anger from the perspective of effortful control is in accordance with the tenet of the "positive psychology" movement. However, effortful control is a complicate structure. For example, effortful control evaluating by self-report questionnaire an be differentiated as two factors: start control and stop control, and the "control" reflecting by self-report questionnaire is also not as same as the one reflecting by reaction latency techniques. The former indicates socio-affective control, and the latter indicates executive function. Keeping all these in mind, we suggest that it is necessary to differentiate the effects of different "control" on trait anger.

For the purpose mentioned above, we will conduct three studies. In the first study, we will examine the relationship between trait anger and the "control" evaluating by self-report questionnaire in Chinese population, including confirming the two factor model of the self control scale and the unique contribution of the two factors to trait anger. In the second study, we will examine the relationship between trait anger and the "control" evaluating by reaction latency techniques,and differentiates the contributions of "control" evaluating by questionnaire and "control" evaluating by reaction latency techniques to trait anger. And in the third study, we will further examine if "controls" evaluating by different instruments affect persons' level of trait anger through different functions (socio-affective control VS executive function).

The results are as follows: (1)Self control had better be described as a two-factor model in Chinese population, which include a stop control factor and a start control factor; (2) stop control and start control can predict trait anger independently, and the relationship between trait anger and stop control is mediated by "control\out", while the relationship between trait anger and start control is mediated by both "control\out" and "control\in"; (3) "hostility-primed cognitive control" and "deviation from hostile stimuli" are correlated with each other, and both of them are not correlated with socio-affective control and trait anger; The implications of the results are discussed.

Document Type学位论文
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
黄端. 不同的“控制”反映不同的愤怒倾向?同时用社会情绪控制和认知控制来预测特质愤怒[D]. 中国科学院心理研究所. 中国科学院大学,2011.
Files in This Item:
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
黄端-博士学位论文.pdf(886KB)学位论文 限制开放CC BY-NC-SAApplication Full Text
Related Services
Recommend this item
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[黄端]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[黄端]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[黄端]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.