PSYCH OpenIR
急性应激损伤错误监控与错误后调整
其他题名Acute stress impairs error monitoring and post-error adjustment
胡娜1; 陈安涛1; 王宴庆2,3; 李晴1; 许珍珍1; 龙泉杉1
第一作者胡娜
通讯作者邮箱xscat@swu.edu.cn
心理所单位排序2
摘要

生活中,个体会时时关注自己的行为结果并及时做出调整以适应环境的变化。但在应激下个体能否有效地监控行为并做出适应性调整依然未知。本研究招募了52名男性大学生被试,将其随机分入应激组与控制组,采用特里尔社会应激测试(Trier Social Stress Test, TSST)诱发个体的应激反应,并结合错误意识任务(Error Awareness Task,EAT)探索个体急性应激下的错误监控与错误后调整过程。应激指标的结果显示应激组个体在应激任务后唾液皮质醇、心率、应激感知自我报告和负性情绪均显著高于控制组,表明急性应激的诱发是成功的。行为结果显示应激组的错误意识正确率显著低于控制组,错误意识反应时显著短于控制组;进一步地,应激组个体在意识到错误之后的试次上正确率显著低于未意识到错误之后的试次,并且应激组个体在意识到错误之后的试次上正确率低于控制组。结果表明急性应激降低了个体对错误反应的监控水平,即便在辨别出错误反应的情况下,个体的行为监控与调节也更差。本研究说明急性应激会损伤行为监控系统,导致个体的行为适应性下降。

其他摘要

Stressor presents a risk factor in everyday life by not only triggering stress responses in the body but also influencing cognitive processing. Previous research has shown that the medial frontal cortex and dorsolateral frontal cortex, on which error processing depends, are susceptible to acute stress. However, few studies have explored the effect of stress on error processing. It is still unclear whether individuals with acute stress can effectively detect their own error responses and how acute stress influences the transfer from error monitoring to post-error adjustment. To address these issues, we recruited 52 healthy male participants and randomly assigned them into stress (n = 26) or control (n = 26) groups. The participants were first asked to undergo an acute stress test or control-stress test and soon after that perform an error awareness task. Acute stress was induced by the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) which consists of a public speech task and a mental arithmetic task. The error awareness task was a motor go/no-go response inhibition task, in which the participants marked the responses where they recognized errors. Additionally, information on the participants’ heart rates, subjective emotional states, and perceived stress levels was collected to evaluate their immediate reaction to stress. Finally, we used salivary cortisol levels to explore the delayed reaction to stress during the experiment. The acute stress induction was indexed by the increases in free cortisol levels, heart rates, perceived stress levels, and negative affect in the stress group compared with the control group. Two main findings were obtained in this study. First, the accuracy of error awareness in the stress group was lower than that of the control group, and the negative affect under acute stress was negatively predictive of the accuracy of error awareness in the stress group but not the control group, suggesting that acute stress led to poor error monitoring. Second, the accuracy of the first trials after aware errors was significantly lower than that after unaware errors in the stress group, but there was no change in the control group, showing that post-error performance was impaired following acute stress. Altogether, the present study demonstrated that participants could not effectively identify error responses after acute stress, and their post -error adjustment was impaired even when the error responses were identified. Our results show that stress plays an important role in error processing, which is consistent with the biphasic-reciprocal model that proposes that stress responses enhance the activation of the amygdala but impair neural functioning in the prefrontal cortex. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that acute stress impairs the performance monitoring system, which leads to impaired post –error adaptive behaviors.

关键词急性应激 错误意识 皮质醇 错误后调整
2020
语种中文
DOI10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00162
发表期刊心理学报
ISSN0439-755X
卷号52期号:02页码:162-172
期刊论文类型实证研究
URL查看原文
收录类别CSCD ; CSSCI ; 中文核心期刊要目总览
项目简介

国家自然科学基金项目(61431013,31771254);; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(SWU1609106,SWU1709107,SWU1809361)资助

CSCD记录号CSCD:CSCD
OA状态OA
取样对象人类
性别
实验干预错误意识任务
测试或任务贝克抑郁量表;应激感知自我报告;状态-特质焦虑量表;正性和负性情绪量表
引用统计
被引频次:2[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/32545
专题中国科学院心理研究所
通讯作者陈安涛
作者单位1.西南大学心理学部认知与人格教育部重点实验室
2.中国科学院心理研究所
3.中国科学院大学心理学系
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
胡娜,陈安涛,王宴庆,等. 急性应激损伤错误监控与错误后调整[J]. 心理学报,2020,52(02):162-172.
APA 胡娜,陈安涛,王宴庆,李晴,许珍珍,&龙泉杉.(2020).急性应激损伤错误监控与错误后调整.心理学报,52(02),162-172.
MLA 胡娜,et al."急性应激损伤错误监控与错误后调整".心理学报 52.02(2020):162-172.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
急性应激损伤错误监控与错误后调.pdf(842KB)期刊论文出版稿限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览 请求全文
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[胡娜]的文章
[陈安涛]的文章
[王宴庆]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[胡娜]的文章
[陈安涛]的文章
[王宴庆]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[胡娜]的文章
[陈安涛]的文章
[王宴庆]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 急性应激损伤错误监控与错误后调.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。