心理测验中正反向表述项目对量表效度的影响
其他题名Effects of Item-wording in Psychological Testing on the Validity of the Questionnaire
王淑娟; 张建新
第一作者王淑娟
通讯作者邮箱zhangjx@psych.ac.cn (张建新)
心理所单位排序1
摘要目的:探讨心理测验中项目的正向和反向表述方式对量表效度的影响。方法:利用修订的焦虑控制问卷中文版进行大样本实测,对测量结果进行验证性因素分析,同时利用多特质多方法(MTMM)模型分析方法对多个模型进行比较,并对比两次测试的结果,确定项目正反向表述和记分对量表效度和结构的影响。结果:两次测试的结果都是具有特质因子和方法因子的模型对数据的拟合最好,两次测试的模型拟合指标分别为:χ2
其他摘要

Objective: To study the effects of the positive and negative item-wording in psychological testing on the validity of the questionnaire. Methods : Investigations in big sample were adopted with the revised Chinese version of the Anxiety Control Questionnaire. And the data were analyzed by CFA (Confirmatory Factor Analysis). Models in two investigations were compared with the method of Multi-Trait Multi-Method to investigate the effect of item-wording on the validity of the questionnaire. Results: The model with trait factor and method factors had the best fit indexes in both tests. And the goodness of fit indexes in both tests were: χ^2/df, 1.46 and 3.75 ;CFI, 0.94, 0.94; IFI, 0.94, 0.94; NNFI, 0.93, 0.93; AGFI, 0.82, 0.90; RMSEA, 0.047,0.051. Conclusion: Both positive and negative item-wording affect the contribution of the trait to explain the data. They are the method effects caused by item-wording.

关键词焦虑控制问卷 项目表述 方法效应 交叉效度验证
学科领域心理测量
2009
语种中文
发表期刊中国临床心理学杂志
ISSN1005-3611
卷号17期号:5页码:554-556
收录类别CSCD ; CSSCI
资助项目“863”计划项目“中国人亚健康”课题(2006AA02Z426)
项目简介

"863"计划项目"中国人亚健康"课题(2006AA02Z426)资助

CSCD记录号CSCD:3757370
附注Objective: To study the effects of the positive and negative item-wording in psychological testing on the validity of the questionnaire. Methods: Investigations in big sample were adopted with the revised Chinese version of the Anxiety Control Questionnaire. And the data were analyzed by CFA (Confirmatory Factor Analysis). Models in two investigations were compared with the method of Multi-Trait Multi-Method to investigate the effect of item-wording on the validity of the questionnaire. Results: The model with trait factor and method factors had the best fit indexes in both tests. And the goodness of fit indexes in both tests were: χ2/df,1.46 and 3.75;CFI, 0.94, 0.94; IFI, 0.94, 0.94; NNFI, 0.93, 0.93; AGFI, 0.82, 0.90; RMSEA, 0.047,0.051. Conclusion: Both positive and negative item-wording affect the contribution of the trait to explain the data. They are the method effects caused by item-wording.
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符https://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/4282
专题中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010)
通讯作者张建新
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
王淑娟,张建新. 心理测验中正反向表述项目对量表效度的影响[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(5):554-556.
APA 王淑娟,&张建新.(2009).心理测验中正反向表述项目对量表效度的影响.中国临床心理学杂志,17(5),554-556.
MLA 王淑娟,et al."心理测验中正反向表述项目对量表效度的影响".中国临床心理学杂志 17.5(2009):554-556.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
心理测验中正反向表述项目对量表效度的影响(248KB) 开放获取--浏览 下载
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[王淑娟]的文章
[张建新]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[王淑娟]的文章
[张建新]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[王淑娟]的文章
[张建新]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 心理测验中正反向表述项目对量表效度的影响.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。