PSYCH OpenIR  > 社会与工程心理学研究室
结婚和离婚倾向的代际差异及其机制研究
其他题名The Study of Intergenerational Difference to Marry and Divorce Tendency and Its Related Mechanisms
高昀
导师周洁
2023-06
摘要婚恋观是人们对于恋爱、婚姻生活以及婚恋过程中吐爱取向等的基本看法,是对待恋爱与婚姻的内在标准,不但直接影响个体对配偶的选择,还会影响个体对未来婚姻、家庭责任和义务的承担。本研究选取婚恋观中两个重要的维度结婚倾向和离婚倾向,通过两个研究分别从横断面和回溯分析的角度,探索了代际间结婚倾向和离婚倾向的差异及其影响机制。 研究一基于社会角色理论和媒体信息传播理论构建了一个有调节的链式中介效应模型,探讨在出生年对结婚和离婚倾向的影响中,亲密关系中的性别角色和性别刻板印象的链式中介作用以及消极媒体信息暴露的调节作用。研究一的结果表明:(1)结婚倾向在代际间存在显著差异并且呈现下降趋势;(2)离婚倾向在代际间存在显著差异并且呈现上升趋势;(3)亲密关系中的性别角色和性别刻板印象在出生年和结婚倾向之间起链式中介作用;(4)亲密关系中的性别角色和性别刻板印象在出生年和离婚倾向之间起链式中介作用;(5)消极媒体信息暴露正向调节了出生年和结婚倾向的关系,具体而言,消极媒体信息暴露越多,出生年和结婚倾向的反向关系越强;(6)消极媒体信息暴露正向调节了出生年和离婚倾向之间的关系,具体而言,消极媒体信息暴露越多,出生年和离婚倾向的正向关系越强;(7)消极媒体信息暴露对出生年和亲密关系中吐别角色的关系不具有调节效应,对出生年通过亲密关系中的性别角色和性别刻板印象影响结婚倾向和离婚倾向的链式中介作用也不具有调节效应。 研究二采用回溯数据分析,通过60后、70后、80后和90后分别回忆自己在20岁、30岁、40岁、50岁、60岁(如果没有则不必回忆)时的结婚倾向、离婚倾向、对亲密关系中的性别角色以及性别刻板印象的看法,探讨代际间关于结婚和离婚倾向的差异是来自于代际差异还是年龄差异,以及亲密关系中的角色和亲密关系中的刻板印象对结婚和离婚倾向的回溯影响机制。得出如下结论:(1)60后、70后、80后、90后的结婚和离婚倾向的代际差异和年龄差异均显著;(2)应用一阶和二阶交叉滞后分析的方法证明了亲密关系中的性别角色和性别刻板印象对出生年和结婚与离婚倾向之间关系的回溯中介效应整体上不成立,也即两者之间的因果效应不存在;但对某些代际在某些年龄段间存在时间上的传递效应。举例来说,对于70后,其40岁时对性别刻板印象的看法会影响50岁时的离婚倾向;其30岁时对性别角色的看法也会影响50岁时的离婚倾向。 本研究在一定程度上回答了代际间结婚与离婚倾向差异的可能机制及消极媒体信息暴露对其的影响。对于理解代际间结婚与离婚倾向的差异具有理论贡献,也对其后续的干预实践具有指导意义。另外,本研究的结论可以应用于更多领域,比如青少年的发展与教育:本研究对亲密关系中性别角色和性别刻板印象的回溯研究,证明了其形成于青年早期,两者作为链式中介变量,直接和间接影响着个体成年之后的结婚和离婚倾向,这说明青少年在家庭教育以及家庭生活中习得的关于性别角色和性别刻板印象的观点,对于其成年之后的婚恋倾向有着重要的影响,从而也影响着一个人健康人格的建立,和其成年之后的终身幸福感。这些都对青少年的发展与教育具有理论指导价值和实践应用意义。
其他摘要It is an intrinsic criterion for the treatment of love and marriage, which not only directly influences individuals' choice of spouse, but also their commitment to future marital and family responsibilities and obligations (Ren, 2009). This study explores the intergenerational changes in the Tendency to marry and the Tendency to divorce and their influencing mechanisms through two studies with a total of nine sub-studies in social groups in a Chinese cultural context, from a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis respectively. Study 1 constructs a moderated chain mediating effect model based on social role theory and media information dissemination theory to explore the chain mediating role of gender roles and gender stereotypes in intimate relationships and the moderating role of negative media information exposure in the effect of birth year on Tendency to marry and divorce. The results of Study 1 showed that: (1) There were significant intergenerational differences in the Tendency to marry and a decreasing trend. (2) There were significant intergenerational differences in the Tendency to divorce and an increasing trend. (3) Gender roles and gender stereotypes in intimate relationships mediated the chain between birth year and Tendency to marry. (4) Gender roles and gender stereotypes in intimate relationships mediated the chain between birth year and Tendency to divorce, and (5) gender stereotypes in intimate relationships mediated the chain between birth year and Tendency to divorce. (5) Negative media exposure positively moderates the relationship between birth year and Tendency to marry, specifically, the more negative media exposure, the stronger the inverse relationship between birth year and Tendency to marry. (6) Negative media exposure positively moderates the relationship between year of birth and Tendency to divorce; specifically, the more negative media exposure, the stronger the positive relationship between year of birth and Tendency to divorce. (7) Negative media exposure did not have a moderating effect on the relationship between birth year and gender roles in intimate relationships, nor did it have a moderating effect on the chain mediating effect of birth year on the Tendency to marry and divorce through gender roles and gender stereotypes in intimate relationships. Using longitudinal data analysis, Study 2 explores whether intergenerational differences regarding Tendency to marry and divorce arise from the generations themselves by recalling their own perceptions of Tendency to marry, Tendency to divorce, gender roles in intimate relationships, and gender stereotypes at ages 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 (or not if they did not have them), respectively. The study explores whether the intergenerational differences in the Tendency to marry and divorce are due to generational differences or to changes in the subjects' own experiences and maturity. The longitudinal mechanisms by which roles in intimate relationships and stereotypes in intimate relationships affect the Tendency to marry and divorce were also explored. The following conclusions were drawn: (1) The Tendency to marry and divorce among the post-60s, post-70s, post-80s and post-90s all formed a stable view around the age of 30 and the Tendency to marry and divorce was significantly correlated at the 0.01 level across all generations at all ages, thus proving that the generational differences in the Tendency to marry and divorce come from the generations themselves rather than from changes in the evaluator's own maturity or experience. (2) The application of first- or second-order cross-lagged analyses demonstrated that the overall longitudinal mediating effect of gender roles and gender stereotypes in intimate relationships on the relationship between birth year and marriage (divorce) did not hold, i.e. that a causal effect between the two did not exist. However, there are temporal transmission effects for certain generations at certain ages. This study examines the intergenerational variation in the Tendency to marry and divorce among the post-60s, post-70s, post-80s, post-90s and post-OOs. And it explores the role of gender roles and gender stereotypes in intimate relationships as a chain mediator in the relationship between birth year and Tendency to marry and divorce. It is also shown that exposure to negative media messages moderates the relationship between birth year and Tendency to marry and divorce. These studies then delve into the realm of longitudinal analysis, demonstrating that intergenerational differences in Tendency to marry and divorce arise primarily from the generations themselves, rather than from the evaluators' own experiences or changes in maturity, and that there is no longitudinal mediating effect of gender roles and gender stereotypes in intimate relationships on the relationship between birth year and Tendency to marry and divorce. Possible mechanisms in intergenerational variation in Tendency to marry and divorce are answered. A theoretical contribution to the study of intergenerational changes in Tendency to marry and divorce and a practical guide to research on its intervention. At the same time the findings of this study can be applied to more areas, such as the developmental education of children, and both gender roles and gender stereotypes in intimate relationships in this study were shown to be formed in early youth, with both acting as chain mediating variables that directly and indirectly influence the Tendency to marry and divorce in adulthood, suggesting that the family education of children as well as adolescents and the views acquired in family life regarding gender roles and This suggests that both children's and adolescents' family education and the gender stereotypes acquired in family life have a significant impact on the Tendency to marry and divorce in adulthood. This has important theoretical and practical implications for the development and education of children and adolescents.
关键词结婚倾向 离婚倾向 性别角色 性别刻板印象 媒体信息暴露
学位类型继续教育硕士
语种中文
学位名称理学硕士
学位专业发展与教育心理学
学位授予单位中国科学院大学
学位授予地点中国科学院心理研究所
文献类型学位论文
条目标识符https://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/45135
专题社会与工程心理学研究室
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
高昀. 结婚和离婚倾向的代际差异及其机制研究[D]. 中国科学院心理研究所. 中国科学院大学,2023.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
3.高昀-硕士学位论文.pdf(3018KB)学位论文 开放获取CC BY-NC-SA请求全文
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[高昀]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[高昀]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[高昀]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。