中文MMPI与MMPI-2效度量表及临床量表的比较研究
史占彪
学位类型硕士
导师郭念锋
1999
学位授予单位中国科学院心理研究所
学位授予地点中国科学院心理研究所
学位专业医学心理学
关键词Mmpi和mmp-2 编码类型符合率 限制性定义编码类型 效度量表 临床量表
摘要本研究目的在于考察中文MMPI和MMPI-2对应基础量表(效度量表和临床量表)之间的延续性程度。实验中采用MMPI/MMPI-2复合问卷,对4种被试(精神分裂症、情感性精神障碍患者、神经症及正常人)共236名被试进行施测。结果表明,两者编码类型总体符合率达90.1%,单点、两点、三点编码符合率分别为81.6%,65.8%,49.2%,高分编码符合率为64%。男性被试两点编码符合率56.8%低于女性被试的72.9%。正常被试三点编码符合率58%高于精神分裂症被试48%的符合率。236名被试中,有156名(66.1%)被试的剖析图符合限制性定义,符合限制性定义的单点、两点、三点编码分别为38.6%,29.7%,21.6%。给以限制性定义后,两点编码符合率由64.4%, 56.8%,72.9%(被试全体,男性,女性)分别提高到84.3%,82.8%,85.7%。不相符合的两点编码类型中,96.4%的MMPI剖析图和MMPI-2具有同样一个编码量表。一致性T分和新常模标准在MMPI-2中的采用对符合率的影响都未达到显著水平。方差分析提示,MMPI和MMPI-2的原始分13个量表中有7个量表存在显著差异,标准T分有12个量表存在显著性差异,尽管量表间有较大差异,但对应临床量表和效度量表的相关系数,无论男女被试,均在0.92以上。综上所述,可以看出:中文MMPI和MMPI-2在临床量表和效度量表上具有较高程度的延续性,同时提示对于MMPI-2需要进一步的深入研究。
其他摘要This study is aimed at examining the degree of the basic scales (validity scales and clinical scales) between The Chinese MMPI and MMPI-2. Four samples (include schizophrenia, affective disorder, neuroses and normal subjects) of 236 subjects completed MMPI/MMPI-2 Combined Questionnaires in groups. The concordance rate for total code types was 90.1%. For 1-point, 2-point, 3-point and elevated code types, they were separately 81.6%, 65.8%, 49.2%, 64%. Only 56.8% of men compared to 73.8% of the women showed concordance in 2-ponit code types between MMPI and MMPI-2. And 58% of normal subjects compared to 48% of the schizophrenia subjects showed concordance in 3-point code types. Of the 236 cases, 156 (66.1%) had code types that were "well-defined" (1-, 2- or 3-point). 1-point, 2-point, 3-point well-defined code types respectively were 38.6%, 29.7%, 21.6%. For 2-point code types which were well-defined, the concordances was 84.3%, 82.8%, 85.7% (all the cases, men, women), higher than 64.4%, 56.8%, 72.9% when they were free-defined. 96.4% of subjects with incongruent 2-point code types had one of the scales in their MMPI code types with MMPI-2 code types. When deference caused by the use of uniform T-scores and new norms in MMPI-2 were found, the differences typically in code types congruence were not very great. Comparison of mean scores for the validity and clinical scales, 7 raw scores and 12 T-scores showed significant difference for MMPI versus MMPI-2 (Form). In spite of significant mean differences, correlational analyses show correlations above 0.92 for the raw scores and T-scores for each gender. All these results showed the good consistence between MMPI and MMPI-2 in basic scales, and showed MMPI-2 should be studied deeply.
页数48
语种中文
文献类型学位论文
条目标识符http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/4872
专题中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010)
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
史占彪. 中文MMPI与MMPI-2效度量表及临床量表的比较研究[D]. 中国科学院心理研究所. 中国科学院心理研究所,1999.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
中文MMPI与MMPI-2效度量表及临床(4045KB)学位论文 开放获取CC BY-NC-SA请求全文
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[史占彪]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[史占彪]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[史占彪]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。