Institutional Repository, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
| Cultural Usability Tests – How Usability Tests Are Not the Same All over the World | |
| Torkil Clemmensen1; Qingxin Shi1; Pradeep Yammiyavar3; Jyoti Kumar2; Huiyang Li2; Xianghong Sun3 | |
| 编者/译者 | Nuray Aykin |
| 2007 | |
| 关键词 | Usability test think aloud cultural usability field study |
| 摘要 | The cultural diversity of users of technology challenges our methods for usability evaluation. In this paper we report on a multi-site, cross-cultural grounded theory field study of think aloud testing in seven companies in three countries (Denmark, China and India). The theoretical model that emerges from the data suggests that the production of a usability problem list is multi-causal and subject to cultural variations. Even the way usability problems are experienced by test participants may be different. In the discussion we outline practical guidelines for a test that is more sensitive towards cultural usability. |
| 学科主题 | 工业与组织心理学 |
| 出版者 | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
| 出版地 | Berlin |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 页 | 281-290 |
| 专著(文集)名 | Usability and Internationalization. HCI and Culture |
| 文献类型 | 专著章节, 文集论文 |
| 条目标识符 | https://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/14283 |
| 专题 | 中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010) |
| 作者单位 | 1.Department of Informatics, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark 2.Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam, India 3.Inst. of psychology, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Torkil Clemmensen,Qingxin Shi,Pradeep Yammiyavar,等. Cultural Usability Tests – How Usability Tests Are Not the Same All over the World. 2007. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 文献类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| Cultural Usability T（177KB） | 专著章节, 文集论文 | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 下载 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
修改评论