PSYCH OpenIR  > 认知与发展心理学研究室
人脑枕叶文字加工区的确定、功能定位和反应特性研究
其他题名Localization and Characterization of an Occipital Word Sensitive Area ----- A new cerebral region for visual word processing
张波
学位类型博士
导师翁旭初
2015-11
学位授予单位中国科学院研究生院
学位授予地点北京
关键词文字识别 枕叶 物体类别加工 正字法 功能磁共振
摘要   文字是人类文明的最伟大发明之一,快速、准确地识别文字是有效阅读的基础。因此,对文字识别及其神经机制的研究具有重要的学术意义和应用潜力。在人类腹侧枕颞皮层,对于特定物体类别的视觉加工通常存在有两个脑区,一个位于枕叶区域,另一个位于更靠前方的枕颞交界处,例如面孔识别系统的枕叶面孔区 (OFA)和梭状回面孔区 (FFA),位置识别系统的枕叶位置区(OPA)和旁海马回位置区 (PPA)。但是对文字加工系统的研究却局限在单个区域(左 侧枕颞沟的VWFA),文字识别理应也遵循物体模式识别的层级加工理论模型,即有一个由简单特征到复杂特征、由低级脑区往高级脑区的逐级累加的加工过程,这就提示在枕叶也可能存在文字加工区域。本论文旨在检验这个假设,确定该区域精细位置并研究其功能特性。
   研究一中使用功能定位(汉字图片减去控制刺激图片在大脑中引起的激活)、解剖标志(大脑的沟回位置)、邻近的其它功能区和视网膜皮质映射图(视野中不同方位的刺激对应着枕叶视皮层的分区)等信息来确定枕叶文字敏感区 (我们命其名为OWA)的详细位置。在13名参加实验的中文为母语的被试上皆确定出了大脑双侧OWA,主要位于枕下回或枕中回,其平均Talairach坐标是左半球的[ 41,76,6 ]和右半球的[ 39,73,6 ],OWA 和视觉词形区(VWFA)之间的空间距离约为22.9毫米。我们还进一步对其中5名被试进行了更详细的实验和分析,结果显示:OWA 相对早期视觉皮层拓扑区要更靠前,相对外侧物体区(LOC)更靠腹侧,相对VWFA 更靠后,相对于视觉运动区(hMT+)更靠下方。
   研究二在研究一的基础上,考察10名被试OWA 对汉字和其他三类经典视觉刺激 (昆虫、椅子、车辆) 的反应特性,检验该区域对文字刺激的选择性,并与其它感兴趣区(VWFA、LOC 和左侧角回)作比较。单变量分析的结果显示:在平均反应强度上,OWA 与VWFA 一样,对汉字的反应强于其他三类刺激;左侧角回也对汉字的反应最强;而LOC 对椅子的反应最强。在对汉字的选择性指标上,左侧OWA 与左侧VWFA 以及左侧角回的差异不显著。多变量模式分析的结果则显示:左侧OWA 对于四类刺激的表征结构类似于VWFA,与LOC 不同;而在将汉字与其他刺激区分的能力上,左侧OWA 显著低于左侧VWFA。上述结果说明OWA 与VWFA 相似,对文字刺激有着类似的反应特性,但OWA 对文字的特异化程度不及VWFA,而且OWA 在对文字反应的选择性上具有一定的左侧化趋势。
   研究三采用16类视觉刺激(汉字、英语词语、数字、音符、数学符号、像汉字的东巴文、像图形的东巴文、简笔小人、人脸、动物、房屋、树木、水果、抽象雕塑、家具、交通工具),进一步考察该区域对文字的选择性加工程度,并与VWFA 作比较。结果显示:以平均反应强度排序,左侧OWA 中排在前五强的刺激类别依次是英语词、汉字、动物、人脸、简笔小人;左侧VWFA 中排在前五强的刺激类别依次是英语词、数学符号、汉字、动物、数字。左侧VWFA 对英语、数字的反应显著高于所有其他类别,但是左侧OWA 对于其前五强刺激的反应差异不显著。这些结果说明,与VWFA 相比,OWA 对文字选择性相对较弱,可能它加工的是符号系统中更低层次的视觉特征。
   研究四利用汉字刺激的视觉特性,构造出汉字真字(符合正字法且有读音),伪字(符合正字法但不可读),非字(不符合正字法不可读)三类刺激来考察OWA 对汉字正字法信息是否敏感,并与VWFA 和LOC 作对比。结果显示,在左侧OWA,非字的反应显著强于真字和伪字,而真字与伪字没有差异;左侧VWFA 和左侧OWA 对这三种刺激的反应趋势几乎相同;而左侧LOC 对物体图反应最强,对非字和伪字的反应差异不显著。这些结果说明,OWA 与VWFA 一样,都对正字法信息敏感。
   本论文通过功能磁共振成像的技术,对人类大脑枕颞皮层的视觉文字加工进行了详细研究,首次明确了人类枕叶中存在的文字敏感区,并考察了其功能特征,加深了对文字和物体识别神经机制的认识。
其他摘要Writing  word  is one of the greatest inventions  of  human  civilization and  human  beings acquire the rapid  word recognition ability through reading. Therefore, it is of  great academic value and clinical significance to investigate the neural mechanisms of  word  processing.  In  the  human  ventral  occipitotemporal  cortex,  category-specific processing for visual objects typically involve pairs of cortical regions, often with one  located in the occipital cortex and another more anteriorly in occipitotemporal junction,  such as  the Occipital Face Area  (OFA) and the  Fusiform  Face Area (FFA)  for  face  processing, the Occipital Place Area (OPA) and the Parahippocampal Place Area (PPA)  for  place/scene  processing.  However,  the  existing  neuroimaging  studies  on  word  recognition  almost  exclusively  focus  on  one  single  region,  i.e.,  the  VWFA  in  the  fusiform area. Moreover, according to hierarchical computational theory, there are a  series  of  layers  processing  increasingly  more  complex  information  —  from  simple  features to converged complex features, flowing from early visual cortex to higher areas  in word recogition, like perception of other objects. The above studies and theory lead  us to hypothsize that there may be a word sensitive region in the occipital lobe. My  thesis  aims  to  test  this  hypothesis,  and  to  localize  this  region  and  investigate  its  functional characteristics.
    In our first study, a new region in the occipital cortex that selectively responded to  Chinese  characters  (we  tentatively  label  it  as  the  OWA)  was  identified.  We  then  precisely localized this region using the following methods: activation maps produced  by  the  contrast  of  Chinese  character  vs.  scrambled  object  image,  well-established  regions in the ventral fusiform and occipital corteces, anatomical landmarks (gyrus and  sulcus in brain), and retinotopic mapping. The OWA was identified and localized in all  13 native Chinese speakers. This region was located near the inferior occipital gyrus or  the middle occipital gyrus. In normalized Talairach space, the coordinates of the OWA  averaged across subjects were [-41,-76,-6] in the left hemisphere and [39,-73,-6] in the right hemisphere. And on average, the distance between the OWA and VWFA was 22.9  mm. Detailed retinotopic maps and human visual motion area (hMT+) were obtained  from five of these subjects, which showed that the OWA was anterior to the retinotopic  areas, more ventral to Lateral Occipital Complex (LOC) , posterior to the VWFA, and inferior to the hMT+.
    In our second study, we examined the OWA’s response characteristics to Chinese  characters and other categories of visual images (cars, chairs and insects) and compared  it’s selectivity to words (Chinese character) with other regions (the VWFA, LOC and  left  Angular  Gyrus  (AG))  in  10  subjects  who  also  participated  in  the  first  study.  Univariate analysis showed that characters generated stronger responses than the other three types of  stimuli in the OWA, VWFA, and AG, while chairs generated strongest  responses  among  the  four  types  of  stimuli  in  the  LOC.  However,  the  difference  of  selectivity index for characters between left OWA and left VWFA was not significant.  Multivariate  pattern  analysis  showed  that  the  representation  structure  for  the  four  categories in left OWA was similar to that in left VWFA, but different  to that of the  LOC. The discriminability index for characters vs. other categories in left OWA was  significantly lower than that in left VWFA. The results suggest that the OWA has similar  mean response properties as  the VWFA,  but  with a less  degree of  specialization  for  words and the OWA is left-lateralized in terms of its word-selectivity.
    In  our  third  study,  we  employed  sixteen  categories  of  visual  images  (Chinese  characters,  English  words,  numbers,  musical  notes,  mathematical  symbols,  Chinese  character-like Dongba characters, picture-like Dongba characters, human figures, faces,  animals,  houses, trees,  fruits, abstract  sculptures,  furniture,  vehicles) to  examine  the  detailed response  profiles  to  multiple types  of  stimuli in  the  OWA and  compare  the  OWA to VWFA with regarding to their word-selectivity. Averaged response amplitudes  from  fifteen  Chinese  subjects  showed  that  five  categories  (English  words,  Chinese  characters, animals, faces, and human figures) in left OWA were the strongest among  the  16 categories, but the response amplitudes of the five categories in left OWA were not  significantly  different.  However,  in  left  VWFA,  responses  to  English  words,  mathematical symbols, Chinese characters, animals and Numbers were the strongest,  and English words and numbers evoked stronger responses than all the other categories  in left VWFA. These results suggest the word-selectivity of the OWA is weak relative  to the VWFA, and the OWA  probably  plays  a role of  processing  more basic visual  features of the symbolic system.
    In our fourth study, we used three types of stimuli images according to orthography of  Chinese  characters.  They  were  real  characters,  pseudo-characters  (with  legal  orthography  regularity  but  no  pronunciation)  and  non-characters  (characters  with
illegal orthography regularity and no pronunciation), to examine whether the OWA was  sensitive  to  orthography  in  Chinese  characters.  The  VWFA  and  LOC   served  as  referenced  regions.  Analysis  of  the  response  amplitudes  from  13  Chinese  college  students revealed that in left OWA, non-characterss  generated  significantly  stronger  responses than real  characters and pseudo-characters, while no difference was found  between real characters and pseudo-characters. The pattern of response amplitudes to the three types of stimuli in left VWFA was  similar to that in left OWA. Although in  left LOC, images of objects generated strongest response, the difference in response  between  non-charcters  and  pseudo-characters  was  not  significant.  Theses  results suggest that like the VWFA, the OWA is also sensitive to orthographic regurality. 
    In sum, we conducted a series of fMRI experiments on the functional role of human  occipitotemporal cortex in visual word processing. We firstly identified a word sensitive area  in  human  occipital  lobe,  and  it  complemented  the  understanding  of  the  neural  mechanisms for word and object recognition.
语种中文
文献类型学位论文
条目标识符http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/19816
专题认知与发展心理学研究室
作者单位中国科学院心理研究所
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
张波. 人脑枕叶文字加工区的确定、功能定位和反应特性研究[D]. 北京. 中国科学院研究生院,2015.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
张波-博士学位论文.pdf(6516KB)学位论文 开放获取CC BY-NC-SA请求全文
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[张波]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[张波]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[张波]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。