Sino-India difference in collectivism and its association with cultural heritage concerning argumentation | |
Ren, Xiaopeng1,2![]() | |
第一作者 | Xiaopeng Ren |
通讯作者邮箱 | renxp@psych.ac.cn (xiaopeng ren ) |
摘要 | Cross-cultural studies from a global perspective contend that China and India are both collectivistic cultures. However, it remains unclear whether and why China and India differ in their collectivism. This study examines whether the cultural heritage concerning argumentation explains why Chinese people are more collectivistic than Indians. Convenient samples were taken from online surveys (N-China = 398, N-India = 418), and 186 participants from the United States were included in the contrast group. In multiple methods conducted here, the Chinese respondents scored higher in holistic thought, compatriotism, nepotism, familism, and self-interdependence than the Indian respondents, while scoring lower in assertiveness and argumentativeness. Although China and India were more collectivistic than the United States, these findings support the hypothesis that Chinese people are more collectivistic than Indians. The study extended our knowledge of individualism-collectivism beyond east-west comparison. |
关键词 | holistic thought compatriotism nepotism collectivism assertiveness cultural heritage concerning argumentation China India |
2023-01-12 | |
语种 | 英语 |
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027599 |
发表期刊 | FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
![]() |
ISSN | 1664-1078 |
卷号 | 13页码:13 |
期刊论文类型 | 实证研究 |
收录类别 | SSCI |
出版者 | FRONTIERS MEDIA SA |
WOS关键词 | INDIVIDUALISM ; SCALE ; RICE |
WOS研究方向 | Psychology |
WOS类目 | Psychology, Multidisciplinary |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000918448100001 |
WOS分区 | Q1 |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | https://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/44612 |
专题 | 社会与工程心理学研究室 |
通讯作者 | Ren, Xiaopeng |
作者单位 | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China 2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China |
第一作者单位 | 中国科学院心理研究所 |
通讯作者单位 | 中国科学院心理研究所 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Ren, Xiaopeng,Kuai, Dongqin. Sino-India difference in collectivism and its association with cultural heritage concerning argumentation[J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY,2023,13:13. |
APA | Ren, Xiaopeng,&Kuai, Dongqin.(2023).Sino-India difference in collectivism and its association with cultural heritage concerning argumentation.FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY,13,13. |
MLA | Ren, Xiaopeng,et al."Sino-India difference in collectivism and its association with cultural heritage concerning argumentation".FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY 13(2023):13. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 文献类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
Sino-India differenc(2662KB) | 期刊论文 | 出版稿 | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 下载 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Ren, Xiaopeng]的文章 |
[Kuai, Dongqin]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Ren, Xiaopeng]的文章 |
[Kuai, Dongqin]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Ren, Xiaopeng]的文章 |
[Kuai, Dongqin]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论